domestic relations order: for the payment of the outstanding mortgage. 8. The parties shall divide equally the net equity from the sale of the condominium in Dallas, Texas. 9. The plaintiff's pension with Travelers shall be divided equally between the parties by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order, and the defendant shall receive 50% of the current value of the pension benefit when the plaintiff retires. The plaintiff's attorney shall draft the QDRO and obtain approval by Travelers. The court retains jurisdiction to modify this portion of the judgment to CT Page 4785 ensure compliance with federal and/or state law relating to retirement/pension benef


Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley

Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley Date: 1999-06-18. Machine-draft public headnote: Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley

QDRO: of this equitable division. The Husband is entitled, by stipulation of the parties, to a credit of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for money advanced during the trial. RETIREMENT ASSETS The Husband shall transfer to the Wife by tax free rollover or qualified domestic relations order all of his Goldman Sachs IRA. LIABILITIES Each party shall be responsible for their own liabilities as shown on their respective financial affidavits. The Husband shall be responsible for all pendente lite orders through June 30, 1999. COUNSEL FEES The Husband shall pay to the Wife as counsel fees the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) by Augus


Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley

domestic relations order: uitable division. The Husband is entitled, by stipulation of the parties, to a credit of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for money advanced during the trial. RETIREMENT ASSETS The Husband shall transfer to the Wife by tax free rollover or qualified domestic relations order all of his Goldman Sachs IRA. LIABILITIES Each party shall be responsible for their own liabilities as shown on their respective financial affidavits. The Husband shall be responsible for all pendente lite orders through June 30, 1999. COUNSEL FEES The Husband shall pay to the Wife as counsel fees the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) by Augus


Thomas McAuley v. Kathryn McAuley

valuation/division: ere married on November 20, 1993, a total of five and one-half years. It was the first marriage for both. By complaint dated May 4, 1998, the Husband instituted this action claiming a dissolution of marriage, custody, an assignment of the marital residence, a property division, and other relief. The Wife did not file an Answer and Cross-Complaint until May 24, 1999 which was permitted by the court over the Husband's objection. In the Cross-Complaint she claims a dissolution of marriage, joint legal custody, an equitable distribution of assets, support, alimony, counsel and expert witness fees, and other relief. Numerous pendente


Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis.

Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis. Date: 2000-07-11. Machine-draft public headnote: Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis.

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis.

QDRO: Ford Windstar. The parties shall hold each other harmless from the costs associated with their own vehicles. 10. State of Connecticut Retirement: The plaintiff shall assign one half of the present value of his retirement policy to the defendant through a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. 11. Tax Exemptions: The plaintiff shall claim Daniel as an exemption on his federal tax returns and the defendant shall claim Renee and Lauren as tax exemptions. In the event, however, the dependency exemption is of no financial value to the defendant, the plaintiff shall be entitled to the exemption. The defendant shall notify the plaintiff on before


Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis.

401(k): interest in the marital home known as 72 Florida Road, Somers, Connecticut to the defendant. The defendant shall hold the plaintiff harmless from all liability in connection with said property, including the remaining mortgage, taxes and insurance. 8. Aetna 401K Plan: CT Page 8092 The plaintiff shall transfer fifty percent interest in this asset to the defendant. 9. Automobiles: The plaintiff shall have the 1993 Pontiac Bonneville and the 1968 Ford Mustang. The defendant shall the 1995 Ford Windstar. The parties shall hold each other harmless from the costs associated with their own vehicles. 10. State of


Timothy Silvis v. Marlene Silvis.

domestic relations order: star. The parties shall hold each other harmless from the costs associated with their own vehicles. 10. State of Connecticut Retirement: The plaintiff shall assign one half of the present value of his retirement policy to the defendant through a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. 11. Tax Exemptions: The plaintiff shall claim Daniel as an exemption on his federal tax returns and the defendant shall claim Renee and Lauren as tax exemptions. In the event, however, the dependency exemption is of no financial value to the defendant, the plaintiff shall be entitled to the exemption. The defendant shall notify the plaintiff on before


Tonya Durnall v. Willard H. Durnall, Sr. Date: 1996-09-11. Machine-draft public headnote: Tonya Durnall v. Willard H. Durnall, Sr. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


QDRO: tion of defendant's support and alimony obligations as herein set forth. Defendant shall provide plaintiff with proper authorization for her to ascertain whether said policies are in full force and effect. 8. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) one-half of the present accrued value of defendant's employment pension. The plaintiff shall be named survivor beneficiary of the pension benefits in the event defendant dies prior to his retirement and the commencement of his benefits. 9. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of $175 as periodic alimony until defendant's support obligat


retirement benefits: The parties purchased their marital residence located at and known as 14 Morse Avenue, Groton, Connecticut around 1981. Presently the home has a value between $95,000 and $100,000 and is subject to mortgages totalling $84,000 to $86,000. The defendant has a retirement account with Vitro Corp, which is valued at $13,890.83 as of July, 31, 1996. (Plaintiff's Exhibit A.) The plaintiff has an IRA of $1,100 and a retirement plan with the Groton Board of Education presently valued at $3,000. The parties also own a 1989 Volvo 240 DL and a 1986 Ford F150, several bank and credit union accounts and life insurance policies. From the evi


pension: with proper authorization for her to ascertain whether said policies are in full force and effect. 8. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) one-half of the present accrued value of defendant's employment pension. The plaintiff shall be named survivor beneficiary of the pension benefits in the event defendant dies prior to his retirement and the commencement of his benefits. 9. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of $175 as periodic alimony until defendant's support obligation for his minor child is terminated. Thereafter, defendant shall pay to the p


domestic relations order: fendant's support and alimony obligations as herein set forth. Defendant shall provide plaintiff with proper authorization for her to ascertain whether said policies are in full force and effect. 8. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) one-half of the present accrued value of defendant's employment pension. The plaintiff shall be named survivor beneficiary of the pension benefits in the event defendant dies prior to his retirement and the commencement of his benefits. 9. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of $175 as periodic alimony until defendant's support obligat


Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian.

Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian. Date: 2000-04-20. Machine-draft public headnote: Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian.


Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian.

QDRO: RETIREMENT ASSETS The Wife is awarded one-half of the Husband's Prudential Insurance Company pension, including survivors benefits, earned between the date of CT Page 5085-lc the marriage to the date of dissolution. Said award is to be made pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to be prepared at the Husband's expense and certified by both counsel. The court will reserve jurisdiction to resolve any disputes concerning this order: LIABILITIES Each party shall be liable for the debts shown on their respective financial affidavits. All pendente lite orders are to be made current through the dissolution of marriage date. COUNSEL


Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian.

pension: kly income of $1,000.00, but in his testimony, he revealed an income of $5,000.00 per month for this year. The court finds he has an income capacity of at least $60,000.00 per year. At the time of the marriage, the Husband had a Prudential Insurance Company pension which started accruing on June 30, 1980. Plaintiff's Exhibit 8 indicates that said pension would pay him $1,369.95 per month at age 65. It is also of note that the Wife received a gift of $50,000.00 from her grandfather which was used to purchase a residence. Her mother, who was a real estate agent, acted as broker on the purchase and sale of the first resi


Victoria Sicilian v. John A. Sicilian.

domestic relations order: ENT ASSETS The Wife is awarded one-half of the Husband's Prudential Insurance Company pension, including survivors benefits, earned between the date of CT Page 5085-lc the marriage to the date of dissolution. Said award is to be made pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to be prepared at the Husband's expense and certified by both counsel. The court will reserve jurisdiction to resolve any disputes concerning this order: LIABILITIES Each party shall be liable for the debts shown on their respective financial affidavits. All pendente lite orders are to be made current through the dissolution of marriage date. COUNSEL


Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward

Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward Date: 1994-03-16. Machine-draft public headnote: Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward


Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward

QDRO: ll retain the 1991 Toyota Camry in her possession. Within 90 days after the date of this dissolution, one-half of the balance currently deposited in the plaintiffs 401K program, through Stanley-Bostitch, shall be withdrawn and paid to the wife pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. Said balance is approximately $6,080.00. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall retain any monies currently held in his or her name alone. Neither party shall make any claim to the checking or savings accounts of the other, nor shall either party make any claim to any monies which the other party may receive as the result of any accident o


Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward

pension: mployees, with the defendant as the irrevocable, sole beneficiary of all the proceeds of said policy. The court determines that it has provided for the defendant' support after the plaintiffs retirement and makes no provisions or allocations of any employee pension due the plaintiff. Each party shall be responsible for their own counsel fees. A decree may enter on the defendants cross-complaint dissolving the marriage and incorporating the aforesaid orders and awards therein. SPALLONE STATE TRIAL REFEREE Judgment Entered in Accordance with Foregoing Memorandum of Decision. Michael Kokoszka, Chief Clerk


Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward

401(k): husband shall retain the 1991 Isuzu motor vehicle presently in his possession and the wife shall retain the 1991 Toyota Camry in her possession. Within 90 days after the date of this dissolution, one-half of the balance currently deposited in the plaintiffs 401K program, through Stanley-Bostitch, shall be withdrawn and paid to the wife pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. Said balance is approximately $6,080.00. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall retain any monies currently held in his or her name alone. Neither party shall make any claim to the checking or savings accounts of the


Wayne Steward v. Beverly Steward

domestic relations order: the 1991 Toyota Camry in her possession. Within 90 days after the date of this dissolution, one-half of the balance currently deposited in the plaintiffs 401K program, through Stanley-Bostitch, shall be withdrawn and paid to the wife pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. Said balance is approximately $6,080.00. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall retain any monies currently held in his or her name alone. Neither party shall make any claim to the checking or savings accounts of the other, nor shall either party make any claim to any monies which the other party may receive as the result of any accident o


Westwood v. Darnell

Westwood v. Darnell Citation: 299 Neb. 612. Extracted reporter citation: 299 Neb. 612. Date: 2018-04-13. Machine-draft public headnote: Westwood v. Darnell is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to family-law retirement/property division context. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Westwood v. Darnell

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 1/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Westwood v. Darnell

retirement benefits: Westwood and Darnell were both employed by the Nebraska Department of Correctional - 614 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 299 Nebraska R eports WESTWOOD v. DARNELL Cite as 299 Neb. 612 Services. Both earned comparable salaries and had premarital retirement accounts to which they continued to contribute after they married. Household expenses were split equally. Westwood quit her job in March 2015. Shortly thereaf- ter, she withdrew $75,393.04 from her retirement account. After taxes, penalties, and fees, the sum of $51,999.99 was deposited in the parties' joint bank account. The couple then paid off outstanding marit


Westwood v. Darnell

valuation/division: Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 299 Nebraska R eports WESTWOOD v. DARNELL Cite as 299 Neb. 612 Jennifer Westwood, appellant, v. Cheryl A. Darnell, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 13, 2018. No. S-17-538. 1. Divorce: Child Custody: Child Support: Property Division: Alimony: Attorney Fees: Appeal and Error. In a marital dissolution action, an appellate court reviews the case de novo on the record to determine whether there has been an abuse of discretion by the trial judge. This standard of review applies to the trial court's determinations regarding custody, child support, division of property, alimony, and atto


William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer

William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer Date: 1995-07-11. Machine-draft public headnote: William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer

QDRO: n taxes due from a sale of the premises. (3) There is assigned and vested in the defendant 60 percent of the present monthly value of the pension benefits of CT Page 8474 plaintiff's vested pension with General Dynamics Corporation, plaintiff's employer, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). (4) There is assigned and vested in the defendant 50 percent of the value of plaintiff's 401K plan as of the date of this decree by QDRO. (5) The court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the QDROs until accomplished. (6) The plaintiff shall pay the defendant $1,500 for her attorney's fees. (7) The plaintiff shall keep his 1989 Toyota.


William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer

pension: T Page 8472 During the marriage, plaintiff has managed to accumulate an SSIP savings of $92,418, IRA trust account of $22,295, an IRA Charter Oak FCU of $2,129, bank accounts of $5,571, and a 1989 Toyota valued at $2,000. In addition, plaintiff has a vested pension at General Dynamics which will pay him $717 per month at age 65, if he ceases employment with General Dynamics now, and $2,540 per month at 65, if plaintiff is employed by General Dynamics at that age. The plaintiff is without any significant debts. The defendant, who is approximately 48 years of age, had been employed at Riverview Hospital in June 1994 d


William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer

401(k): f the pension benefits of CT Page 8474 plaintiff's vested pension with General Dynamics Corporation, plaintiff's employer, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). (4) There is assigned and vested in the defendant 50 percent of the value of plaintiff's 401K plan as of the date of this decree by QDRO. (5) The court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the QDROs until accomplished. (6) The plaintiff shall pay the defendant $1,500 for her attorney's fees. (7) The plaintiff shall keep his 1989 Toyota. (8) The defendant shall keep her 1993 Toyota. (9) The defendant's maiden name is restored to her.


William D. Shaffer v. MacY W. Shaffer

domestic relations order: e from a sale of the premises. (3) There is assigned and vested in the defendant 60 percent of the present monthly value of the pension benefits of CT Page 8474 plaintiff's vested pension with General Dynamics Corporation, plaintiff's employer, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). (4) There is assigned and vested in the defendant 50 percent of the value of plaintiff's 401K plan as of the date of this decree by QDRO. (5) The court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the QDROs until accomplished. (6) The plaintiff shall pay the defendant $1,500 for her attorney's fees. (7) The plaintiff shall keep his 1989 Toyota.


William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw

William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw Date: 1995-01-24. Machine-draft public headnote: William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw


William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw

QDRO: dant, or her remarriage or cohabitation as defined by statute. 2. Said award of alimony shall commence on February 1, 1995. PENSIONS AND IRAs 1. The defendant shall be entitled to a 50% interest in the plaintiff's GTE pension to be secured by means of a QDRO. CT Page 324 2. The defendant shall be entitled to a 50% interest in the present value of the plaintiff's Marsh McLennan pension, to be secured by means of a QDRO. 3. The defendant shall retain her IRAs and any interest she may have in any pension or retirement plan through her employment. 4. The plaintiff shall transfer $5000 from his IRA to the defe


William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw

retirement benefits: QDRO. CT Page 324 2. The defendant shall be entitled to a 50% interest in the present value of the plaintiff's Marsh McLennan pension, to be secured by means of a QDRO. 3. The defendant shall retain her IRAs and any interest she may have in any pension or retirement plan through her employment. 4. The plaintiff shall transfer $5000 from his IRA to the defendant's IRA. OTHER PROPERTY 1. The defendant shall retain her interest in the Rene Place property in Fairfield, Connecticut. 2. The plaintiff shall retain his O'Day sailboat and shall be solely responsible for the outstanding loan thereon. 3. Each party shall be


William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw

pension: dit cards and joint account which she used for the children. After the institution of this dissolution, the plaintiff gave the defendant $600 per week for her own use. The plaintiff has a gross income of approximately $145,000 per year. He has a 401(K), a pension plan and a stock purchase plan which generates some additional income, as set forth in his financial affidavit. The defendant is earning approximately $43,000 per year gross. Her net income is approximately $2350 per month. The major asset of the parties and the major bone of contention between the parties is the marital home. The home has a fair market


William E. Armshaw v. Stephanie Armshaw

401(k): to the credit cards and joint account which she used for the children. After the institution of this dissolution, the plaintiff gave the defendant $600 per week for her own use. The plaintiff has a gross income of approximately $145,000 per year. He has a 401(K), a pension plan and a stock purchase plan which generates some additional income, as set forth in his financial affidavit. The defendant is earning approximately $43,000 per year gross. Her net income is approximately $2350 per month. The major asset of the parties and the major bone of contention between the parties is the marital home. The home has a


William F. Buonocore v. Marion G. Buonocore Date: 1993-06-10. Machine-draft public headnote: William F. Buonocore v. Marion G. Buonocore is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


QDRO: ot later than six months from the date of this judgment. 12. The plaintiff is ordered to transfer to the defendant immediately one-half of his retirement savings account, estimated to be $20,000; therefore, the transfer amount is approximately $10,000.00. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order may issue provided the plaintiff fails to immediately comply with this order. 13. The plaintiff may retain his pension without sharing it with the defendant. 14. The plaintiff shall provide Blue Cross, Blue Shield, CMS or their equivalent for the minor children, and he shall pay one-half of all unreimbursed medical, surgical, hospital, optical, psychiat


pension: irement savings account, estimated to be $20,000; therefore, the transfer amount is approximately $10,000.00. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order may issue provided the plaintiff fails to immediately comply with this order. 13. The plaintiff may retain his pension without sharing it with the defendant. 14. The plaintiff shall provide Blue Cross, Blue Shield, CMS or their equivalent for the minor children, and he shall pay one-half of all unreimbursed medical, surgical, hospital, optical, psychiatric, psychological and nursing expenses and half of the unreimbursed costs of prescription drugs, and dental and orthodon


domestic relations order: han six months from the date of this judgment. 12. The plaintiff is ordered to transfer to the defendant immediately one-half of his retirement savings account, estimated to be $20,000; therefore, the transfer amount is approximately $10,000.00. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order may issue provided the plaintiff fails to immediately comply with this order. 13. The plaintiff may retain his pension without sharing it with the defendant. 14. The plaintiff shall provide Blue Cross, Blue Shield, CMS or their equivalent for the minor children, and he shall pay one-half of all unreimbursed medical, surgical, hospital, optical, psychiat


William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss

William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss Date: 1994-04-28. Machine-draft public headnote: William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss


William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss

QDRO: pt as stated hereinafter), the real estate described as No. 20 Beechwood Boulevard, Norwich, Connecticut, subject to all encumbrances thereon which he shall pay and save the defendant harmless therefrom. (4) The plaintiff shall transfer to the defendant, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), the sum of $1,000 from his SSIP. The court shall retain jurisdiction over this transfer to ensure compliance with applicable law. (5) The plaintiff shall own, take and have, free of any claims of the defendant, the contents of the Norwich home, CT Page 4588 his motor vehicle, his bank accounts, his SSIP (except for the transfer ordered above) and


William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss

retirement benefits: re compliance with applicable law. (5) The plaintiff shall own, take and have, free of any claims of the defendant, the contents of the Norwich home, CT Page 4588 his motor vehicle, his bank accounts, his SSIP (except for the transfer ordered above) and his retirement plan. (6) The defendant shall own, take and have, free of any claims of the plaintiff, her mother's inheritance, her motor vehicle, and the personal property now in her possession. (7) Each shall pay the liabilities shown on their respective financial affidavits. (8) The plaintiff shall execute and deliver a promissory note secured by a third mortgage on t


William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss

pension: se and may have added $5,000 in cash. The court believes the house had to be worth in the area of $60,000 at the time of purchase and has appreciated only $20,000. The husband also has an SSIP account worth $5,000 which is taxable upon withdrawal, and an EB pension which is vested and would provide a monthly benefit of $460.77 upon his retirement at age 65. The wife has an inheritance of $4,300 from her mother's estate. They each have motor vehicles of modest value. The wife accumulated over $6,000 from her earnings as of late 1992, which she termed the `window fund' The money was intended for new windows in the fam


William J. Barss v. Colleen A. Barss

domestic relations order: ed hereinafter), the real estate described as No. 20 Beechwood Boulevard, Norwich, Connecticut, subject to all encumbrances thereon which he shall pay and save the defendant harmless therefrom. (4) The plaintiff shall transfer to the defendant, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), the sum of $1,000 from his SSIP. The court shall retain jurisdiction over this transfer to ensure compliance with applicable law. (5) The plaintiff shall own, take and have, free of any claims of the defendant, the contents of the Norwich home, CT Page 4588 his motor vehicle, his bank accounts, his SSIP (except for the transfer ordered above) and


William Storey v. Suzanne Storey.

William Storey v. Suzanne Storey. Date: 2001-09-25. Machine-draft public headnote: William Storey v. Suzanne Storey. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


William Storey v. Suzanne Storey.

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


William Storey v. Suzanne Storey.

QDRO: e, from the injuries he sustained during the marriage, shall be divided equally between the parties. 10. Relative to plaintiff's Teamster Pension, the plaintiff shall elect the 75% Husband and Wife Pension Plan. See Teamster's Pension Booklet in the file. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall be executed to provide this benefit to the defendant. Said document shall be prepared immediately by defendant's attorney. The defendant shall be designated the survivor beneficiary of said pension if the plan permits it. Plaintiff shall cooperate with defendant's attorney in the execution of such documents. The court will retain jurisdiction of thi


William Storey v. Suzanne Storey.

pension: sulting from his employment at Hendel Petroleum Company in 1993. This seriously limited his ability to engage in gainful employment. He is presently receiving a non-taxable Social Security Disability of $256.00 per week and a non-taxable Teamster's disability pension which pays him $98.00 per week. At age 64 plaintiff will be entitled to a monthly benefit of $1,391.00 from his Teamster's pension. Plaintiff instituted a worker's compensation claim for the cardiomyopathy he claims he incurred from his employment at Hendel Petroleum Company. On April 4, 2000 the plaintiff entered into a stipulation concerning his worke


William Storey v. Suzanne Storey.

domestic relations order: e injuries he sustained during the marriage, shall be divided equally between the parties. 10. Relative to plaintiff's Teamster Pension, the plaintiff shall elect the 75% Husband and Wife Pension Plan. See Teamster's Pension Booklet in the file. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall be executed to provide this benefit to the defendant. Said document shall be prepared immediately by defendant's attorney. The defendant shall be designated the survivor beneficiary of said pension if the plan permits it. Plaintiff shall cooperate with defendant's attorney in the execution of such documents. The court will retain jurisdiction of thi


Willprecht v. Willprecht

Willprecht v. Willprecht Citation: 2021 ND 17. Extracted reporter citation: 2021 ND 17. Docket: 20200195. Date: 2021-02-18. Machine-draft public headnote: Willprecht v. Willprecht is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to family-law retirement/property division context. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Willprecht v. Willprecht

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 1/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Willprecht v. Willprecht

valuation/division: for its decision. Id. Property distribution and spousal support are interrelated and often must be considered together. Id. at ¶ 40. [¶8] In the district court's original findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment, it concluded: "As with property division, the Court must consider the Ruff- Fischer Guidelines in making its determination of spousal support. The parties were 42 and 45 years of age respectively, at the date of the hearing. Both parties are healthy. Kevin's drinking appears to 3 be the root cause of the demise of this near 20-year marriage. Although, the parties accumulated farm assets dur