Janet L. Lavallee v. Richard A. Lavallee. Date: 1992-07-23. Machine-draft public headnote: Janet L. Lavallee v. Richard A. Lavallee. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 2/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


QDRO: children as provided through his employer and will share the unreimbursed expenses equally. 8. Defendant will make available to the plaintiff COBRA benefits. 9. The defendant will transfer his Shannon Enterprises, Inc. stock and one half his ESOP plan by QDRO to the plaintiff. 10. The defendant will be entitled to claim both children as dependents for income tax purposes. 11. The defendant to get the Ford Mustang and Bronco. The plaintiff to get the Mitsubishi Galant and the Jaguar which should defray her legal expenses. 12. The defendant will maintain $50,000 of life insurance for each child during their


Janet Lucas v. George Lucas

Janet Lucas v. George Lucas Citation: Domestic Relations Order. Extracted reporter citation: Domestic Relations Order. Date: 1994-11-03. Machine-draft public headnote: Janet Lucas v. George Lucas is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Janet Lucas v. George Lucas

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Janet Lucas v. George Lucas

pension: he plaintiff, subject to the two outstanding mortgages on that property which the plaintiff shall assume and hold the defendant harmless from any liability thereon. A Qualified Uniform Domestic Relations Order for the transfer of one-half of the defendant's pension plan and one half of the CT Page 11174 defendant's tax deferred annuity to the plaintiff shall be issued and the defendant shall cooperate in executing any necessary papers to effect this order of the court. The contents of the marital home shall belong to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff $1000. forthwith which she shall use to pay t


Janet Lucas v. George Lucas

domestic relations order: one half interest in the family property at 10 April Lane in Shelton to the plaintiff, subject to the two outstanding mortgages on that property which the plaintiff shall assume and hold the defendant harmless from any liability thereon. A Qualified Uniform Domestic Relations Order for the transfer of one-half of the defendant's pension plan and one half of the CT Page 11174 defendant's tax deferred annuity to the plaintiff shall be issued and the defendant shall cooperate in executing any necessary papers to effect this order of the court. The contents of the marital home shall belong to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the


Janice Torres v. Israel Torres.

Janice Torres v. Israel Torres. Date: 2002-04-01. Machine-draft public headnote: Janice Torres v. Israel Torres. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Janice Torres v. Israel Torres.


Janice Torres v. Israel Torres.

QDRO: home. The defendant shall have no obligation to pay the mortgage, taxes, insurance, or any other expense associated with the home. 7. Within 30 days the defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff the entire balance of his 401k. This shall be accomplished by Qualified Domestic Relations Order to be prepared by plaintiff's counsel. The court will retain jurisdiction until this transfer has been accomplished. 8. The defendant shall retain the full balance of his Teamsters pension, free and clear of the claims of the plaintiff. 9. The defendant shall retain his Mitsubishi automobile. The plaintiff shall retain the Jeep which is parked in the ya


Janice Torres v. Israel Torres.

pension: ortion of which is not covered by insurance. She is not able to be employed. The defendant, age 45, is in apparent good health. He is employed by United Parcel Service and is a member of the Teamsters Union. He earns approximately $45,000 per year. He has a pension though his union which will pay him $2,402 per month beginning at age 64. The total present actuarial value of the pension is $87,000. The defendant also has a 401k through his union with an account value of $21,651.97. The parties own a home at 54 Goodwin Park Road, Wethersfield where the plaintiff lives with the minor child. The house has a value of $13


Janice Torres v. Israel Torres.

401(k): e and is a member of the Teamsters Union. He earns approximately $45,000 per year. He has a pension though his union which will pay him $2,402 per month beginning at age 64. The total present actuarial value of the pension is $87,000. The defendant also has a 401k through his union with an account value of $21,651.97. The parties own a home at 54 Goodwin Park Road, Wethersfield where the plaintiff lives with the minor child. The house has a value of $132,000 and is encumbered with a mortgage with a balance of $100,800. The parties agreed that the house should remain in joint names, but that the plaintiff will conti


Janice Torres v. Israel Torres.

domestic relations order: defendant shall have no obligation to pay the mortgage, taxes, insurance, or any other expense associated with the home. 7. Within 30 days the defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff the entire balance of his 401k. This shall be accomplished by Qualified Domestic Relations Order to be prepared by plaintiff's counsel. The court will retain jurisdiction until this transfer has been accomplished. 8. The defendant shall retain the full balance of his Teamsters pension, free and clear of the claims of the plaintiff. 9. The defendant shall retain his Mitsubishi automobile. The plaintiff shall retain the Jeep which is parked in the ya


Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner

Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner Date: 1996-03-19. Machine-draft public headnote: Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner


Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner

QDRO: the sum of approximately fifteen hundred ($1,500.00) dollars. 5. The defendant is awarded the following assets: his checking and savings accounts; his IRA Rollover (Fidelity); his 1986 Mercedes automobile. 6. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) fifty (50%) percent of his interests valued as of the date of this judgment in the following: his IBM 401k pension and profit sharing plan; his IBM Retirement plan. 7. From the defendant's Gemini 401k and Profit-Sharing Plan, the defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) the sum of ten thousand ($10,000.


Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner

retirement benefits: des automobile. 6. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) fifty (50%) percent of his interests valued as of the date of this judgment in the following: his IBM 401k pension and profit sharing plan; his IBM Retirement plan. 7. From the defendant's Gemini 401k and Profit-Sharing Plan, the defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) the sum of ten thousand ($10,000.00) dollars. The defendant is awarded the entire balance of this plan. CT Page 2211 The court retains jurisdiction to modify all the QDROs ordered to comply with federal and


Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner

pension: s made to the plaintiff commencing September 12, 1994, when the parties submitted a stipulation with respect to pendente lite orders. 4. The plaintiff is awarded the following assets: her checking and savings accounts; her IRA Fidelity account; her Banker's Pension Services account; the proceeds due from the loss of the Volvo automobile in the sum of approximately fifteen hundred ($1,500.00) dollars. 5. The defendant is awarded the following assets: his checking and savings accounts; his IRA Rollover (Fidelity); his 1986 Mercedes automobile. 6. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Rela


Janis Bonner v. Chris Bonner

401(k): s; his IRA Rollover (Fidelity); his 1986 Mercedes automobile. 6. The defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) fifty (50%) percent of his interests valued as of the date of this judgment in the following: his IBM 401k pension and profit sharing plan; his IBM Retirement plan. 7. From the defendant's Gemini 401k and Profit-Sharing Plan, the defendant shall assign to the plaintiff by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) the sum of ten thousand ($10,000.00) dollars. The defendant is awarded the entire balance of this plan. CT Page 2211 The court retains jurisdiction t


Jean Ann Monroe v. Bruce Allen Monroe.

Jean Ann Monroe v. Bruce Allen Monroe. Date: 2001-01-05. Machine-draft public headnote: Jean Ann Monroe v. Bruce Allen Monroe. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Jean Ann Monroe v. Bruce Allen Monroe.


Jean Ann Monroe v. Bruce Allen Monroe.

QDRO: deferred investment account (401K) through her employment at Boebringer Ingeiheim in the amount of $62,895.00. The Wife shall retain 75% of said sum and transfer to the Husband 25% of said sum within 90 days of the date of the dissolution. In the event that a QDRO CT Page 596 is necessary to divide this account, the costs of the preparation of the necessary documents shall be shared equally by the parties. The Superior court shall retain jurisdiction over the tax deferred account until it is distributed between the parties and to resolve any disputes which may arise with regard to the preparation and execution of the


Jean Ann Monroe v. Bruce Allen Monroe.

401(k): e is unable to do so, she shall apply each year thereafter until she so qualifies. The Wife shall provide proof to the Husband that she has complied each year with this order. TAX DEFERRED INVESTMENT ACCOUNT The Wife has a tax deferred investment account (401K) through her employment at Boebringer Ingeiheim in the amount of $62,895.00. The Wife shall retain 75% of said sum and transfer to the Husband 25% of said sum within 90 days of the date of the dissolution. In the event that a QDRO CT Page 596 is necessary to divide this account, the costs of the preparation of the necessary documents shall be shared equally


Jeannette Kilcourse v. Michael W. Kilcourse. Citation: Domestic Relations Order. Extracted reporter citation: Domestic Relations Order. Date: 2001-03-26. Machine-draft public headnote: Jeannette Kilcourse v. Michael W. Kilcourse. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


pension: other part-time position. The plaintiff underwent cardiac catheterization in April 2000 after becoming ill at work. She continues to work full-time. The parties purchased a condominium in 1995. The source of the down payment was $6000 from the plaintiff's pension fund and a gift of CT Page 4062 approximately $6000 from the defendant's parents. The parties paid $129,000 and have a mortgage balance of approximately $118,000. The court finds that the fair market value of the condominium is approximately $135,000. The defendant is a beneficiary of a Family Trust. The court has insufficient evidence upon which to base an


domestic relations order: 12. The defendant shall transfer 50% of his interest valued as of the date of judgment in the town of Ridgefield Pension Plans, both Union and Non-Union to the plaintiff. She shall hold that interest jointly with right of survivorship. He shall prepare the Domestic Relations Order necessary to effectuate this transfer. All other claims for relief not specifically addressed herein have been rejected. Judgment shall enter accordingly. SANDRA VILARDI LEHENY


Jeffrey A. Davis v. Joanne M. Davis.

Jeffrey A. Davis v. Joanne M. Davis. Date: 2001-06-29. Machine-draft public headnote: Jeffrey A. Davis v. Joanne M. Davis. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Jeffrey A. Davis v. Joanne M. Davis.

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Jeffrey A. Davis v. Joanne M. Davis.

QDRO: pointed evaluator, and the attorney for the child are to be paid within ninety days. The husband shall transfer to the wife, fifty-five percent of the CT Page 8778 Veriflex Retirement Annuity and fifty-five per cent of the Carpenters Supplemental Annuity by Qualified Domestic Relations Orders. d. Alimony The court finds that absent any evidence of an inability to secure and maintain employment, the wife has an earning capacity of at least $240.00 per week gross. The husband's current earnings are approximately $840.00 per week gross. In considering that the husband will bear 100% of the expenses for the minor child and in view of the fact t


Jeffrey A. Davis v. Joanne M. Davis.

domestic relations order: aluator, and the attorney for the child are to be paid within ninety days. The husband shall transfer to the wife, fifty-five percent of the CT Page 8778 Veriflex Retirement Annuity and fifty-five per cent of the Carpenters Supplemental Annuity by Qualified Domestic Relations Orders. d. Alimony The court finds that absent any evidence of an inability to secure and maintain employment, the wife has an earning capacity of at least $240.00 per week gross. The husband's current earnings are approximately $840.00 per week gross. In considering that the husband will bear 100% of the expenses for the minor child and in view of the fact t


Jill Raynor v. Robert Raynor

Jill Raynor v. Robert Raynor Date: 1995-07-27. Machine-draft public headnote: Jill Raynor v. Robert Raynor is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Jill Raynor v. Robert Raynor


Jill Raynor v. Robert Raynor

QDRO: OTHER PROPERTY A. The defendant is to turn over to the plaintiff, to be placed in her name as custodial parent, any bankbooks presently held by defendant for the benefit of the minor children of the marriage, Marc and Steven. B. Defendant is to execute a QDRO awarding plaintiff 40% of the Mutual Benefit Life deferred compensation plan's present value, reflected in the defendant's Financial Affidavit to have a value of $32,561.38. C. The defendant shall execute a QDRO awarding to plaintiff and for plaintiff's account 40% of his Pension Manor Bridgeport Diocesan deferred compensation plan, present value, reflect


Jill Raynor v. Robert Raynor

pension: iff 40% of the Mutual Benefit Life deferred compensation plan's present value, reflected in the defendant's Financial Affidavit to have a value of $32,561.38. C. The defendant shall execute a QDRO awarding to plaintiff and for plaintiff's account 40% of his Pension Manor Bridgeport Diocesan deferred compensation plan, present value, reflected in his Financial Affidavit to have a value of $19,626.56. D. Defendant is to execute a QDRO awarding plaintiff and for plaintiff's account 40% of his Mutual of America deferred compensation plan's present value, reflected in his Financial Affidavit to have a value of $5,208.33.


Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer.

Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer. Date: 1990-08-14. Machine-draft public headnote: Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer.


Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer.

QDRO: set forth on his financial affidavit if not otherwise disposed of in this memorandum. 2. The plaintiff shall be responsible for the debts and liabilities as set forth on her financial affidavit if not otherwise disposed of in this memorandum. Q.D.R.O. A qualified Domestic Relations order shall enter granting to the wife 50% of the husband's 401K account as of October 1, 1990. Counsel shall agree upon the prepared order and submit the same to the court. The court shall retain jurisdiction to effectuate the entry of this order. Insurance 1. The husband shall provide and maintain a life insurance policy in the amount of One Hundred Thousan


Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer.

401(k): . The plaintiff shall be responsible for the debts and liabilities as set forth on her financial affidavit if not otherwise disposed of in this memorandum. Q.D.R.O. A qualified Domestic Relations order shall enter granting to the wife 50% of the husband's 401K account as of October 1, 1990. Counsel shall agree upon the prepared order and submit the same to the court. The court shall retain jurisdiction to effectuate the entry of this order. Insurance 1. The husband shall provide and maintain a life insurance policy in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) naming the wife as irrevocable benefic


Jo Ann Dwyer v. James Dwyer.

domestic relations order: on his financial affidavit if not otherwise disposed of in this memorandum. 2. The plaintiff shall be responsible for the debts and liabilities as set forth on her financial affidavit if not otherwise disposed of in this memorandum. Q.D.R.O. A qualified Domestic Relations order shall enter granting to the wife 50% of the husband's 401K account as of October 1, 1990. Counsel shall agree upon the prepared order and submit the same to the court. The court shall retain jurisdiction to effectuate the entry of this order. Insurance 1. The husband shall provide and maintain a life insurance policy in the amount of One Hundred Thousan


Joan Fowler v. Barry Fowler

Joan Fowler v. Barry Fowler Date: 1997-03-04. Machine-draft public headnote: Joan Fowler v. Barry Fowler is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joan Fowler v. Barry Fowler


Joan Fowler v. Barry Fowler

QDRO: rst mortgage, then the real estate shall be placed on the market and shall be sold without delay. OTHER PROPERTY 1. The plaintiff shall be entitled to 50% of the present day value of the defendant's SNET Retirement Savings Plan to be secured by means of a QDRO. 2. The plaintiff shall be entitled to 50% of the present day value of the defendant's SNET Pension Plan to be secured by means of a QDRO. 3. The defendant shall be entitled to his TRASOP Fund, the Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Policy, the John Hancock Insurance Policy, the Monetta Mutual Fund, and the U.S. Savings Bonds in his name. 4. With respect t


Joan Fowler v. Barry Fowler

pension: . A contested hearing as to the division of the marital assets was held on the petition to dissolve the marriage at which time both parties filed new affidavits and both parties were heard at length. The court finds that the defendant failed to disclose a pension valued at $97,800, 155 shares of SNET stock, and a John Hancock Life Insurance police with a cash value of $3657. The CT Page 1913 defendant also understated his SNET Management Retirement Savings an by approximately $10,000 and failed to disclose his $150,000 life insurance policy. The court finds that the parties have not resumed a marital relationship


Joann Elliott v. Michael Elliott

Joann Elliott v. Michael Elliott Date: 1998-11-17. Machine-draft public headnote: Joann Elliott v. Michael Elliott is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joann Elliott v. Michael Elliott

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Joann Elliott v. Michael Elliott

QDRO: h party shall retain whatever personal property they have in their respective possession including their respective bank accounts. Miscellaneous 1. The plaintiff shall be entitled to 50% or 1/2 of the defendant's 401(k) which shall be secured by means of a QDRO. 2. The defendant's counsel is holding the sum of $7,000 in escrow. From said account, the defendant shall pay the following: a) the debt to Mark Firriulo in the amount of $1320; b) the sum of $380.80 shall be paid to plaintiff's counsel for court costs and sheriff's fees; c) a lump sum amount of $1,000 shall be paid to the plaintiff; d) the Visa


Joann Elliott v. Michael Elliott

401(k): s permitted by the leasing company. 3. Each party shall retain whatever personal property they have in their respective possession including their respective bank accounts. Miscellaneous 1. The plaintiff shall be entitled to 50% or 1/2 of the defendant's 401(k) which shall be secured by means of a QDRO. 2. The defendant's counsel is holding the sum of $7,000 in escrow. From said account, the defendant shall pay the following: a) the debt to Mark Firriulo in the amount of $1320; b) the sum of $380.80 shall be paid to plaintiff's counsel for court costs and sheriff's fees; c) a lump sum amount of $1,000 shal


John Boyle v. Anne M. Boyle.

John Boyle v. Anne M. Boyle. Date: 1991-10-24. Machine-draft public headnote: John Boyle v. Anne M. Boyle. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Boyle v. Anne M. Boyle.

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 2/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


John Boyle v. Anne M. Boyle.

QDRO: nterest in the 1988 Subaru auto to the defendant and the plaintiff shall immediately pay any delinquent municipal taxes due thereon. The defendant shall assume and pay the remaining loan secured by said auto. The attorney for the plaintiff shall prepare any QDRO required to effectuate the pension division and shall prepare the judgment file. HARRIGAN, JUDGE


John Boyle v. Anne M. Boyle.

pension: thout any advance notice to the defendant the plaintiff moved from the family home on June 29, 1990 and shortly thereafter began cohabiting with another woman. After mandatory deductions, the plaintiff's net disposable income is $607 weekly. He has a vested pension at his place of employment containing $7,453.00. The parties have no other significant assets. Having considered the evidence: in view of the statutory criteria the court finds that the allegations of the complaint have been proven, and the court enters the following judgment. 1. A decree is entered dissolving the parties' marriage on the ground of irretr


John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.

John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton. Date: 1991-01-16. Machine-draft public headnote: John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.


John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.

QDRO: le through his employment for as long as the law allows or for as long as any benefit or pension plan allows, whichever is longer, at her expense. 6. Twenty-five percent of the husband's pension at Pratt and Whitney shall be conveyed to the wife by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared for approval by the Court by defendant's counsel. The pension benefit to be allocated shall be determined by multiplying the husband's total pension benefit at the time he retires by a fraction consisting of a denominator equal to the husband's total years of credit as a Plan participant and a numerator of 18. 7. The issue of perso


John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.

pension: balance on or before April 15, 1994. The award of property shall be effective upon the plaintiff's execution of the mortgage note and deed. 3. The defendant is awarded one hundred percent of the survivor (contingent) annuity provided for in the plaintiff's pension plan, and shall remain beneficiary of any death benefit of the pension for her lifetime. 4. The plaintiff shall pay to the defendant as alimony $100.00 per week until the death of either party or the defendant's remarriage. 5. The plaintiff shall cooperate in maintaining the defendant on the medical insurance plan available through his employment for as


John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.

domestic relations order: his employment for as long as the law allows or for as long as any benefit or pension plan allows, whichever is longer, at her expense. 6. Twenty-five percent of the husband's pension at Pratt and Whitney shall be conveyed to the wife by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared for approval by the Court by defendant's counsel. The pension benefit to be allocated shall be determined by multiplying the husband's total pension benefit at the time he retires by a fraction consisting of a denominator equal to the husband's total years of credit as a Plan participant and a numerator of 18. 7. The issue of perso


John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski.

John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski. Date: 2000-11-03. Machine-draft public headnote: John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski.


John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski.

QDRO: substantially in compliance with the FNMA forms for residential property within 30 days. 9. The Wife is the owner of 25% of the Husband's Textron pension valued as of June 30, 2000 and is named the alternate payee of that portion of his pension interest. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order enters to secure that payment. The court retains jurisdiction over the QDRO for purposes of its effectuation in accordance with these orders. 10. The parties shall each pay one half of the tuition and fees for the Holy Cross Parochial School. 11. The wife shall maintain the life insurance that she currently has for the benefit of the minor child. 12.


John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski.

pension: s as a tool maker. During the time of his employment there have been periods where more or less overtime has been available. There is no overtime presently available to him. Therefore, his financial affidavit reflects his current earnings accurately. He has a pension with Textron. No evidence was presented to the court as to its value. A stream of cash valuation was given in the nature of the reporting that based upon earnings to date, Mr. Cierniewski will receive $711 per month from the pension upon his retirement. No actuarial calculation was provided to the court as to its present value based on that figure, the husb


John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski.

alternate payee: wife shall execute a promissory note and mortgage in a form substantially in compliance with the FNMA forms for residential property within 30 days. 9. The Wife is the owner of 25% of the Husband's Textron pension valued as of June 30, 2000 and is named the alternate payee of that portion of his pension interest. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order enters to secure that payment. The court retains jurisdiction over the QDRO for purposes of its effectuation in accordance with these orders. 10. The parties shall each pay one half of the tuition and fees for the Holy Cross Parochial School. 11. The wife shall maintain the li


John Cierniewski v. Anna Cierniewski.

domestic relations order: ally in compliance with the FNMA forms for residential property within 30 days. 9. The Wife is the owner of 25% of the Husband's Textron pension valued as of June 30, 2000 and is named the alternate payee of that portion of his pension interest. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order enters to secure that payment. The court retains jurisdiction over the QDRO for purposes of its effectuation in accordance with these orders. 10. The parties shall each pay one half of the tuition and fees for the Holy Cross Parochial School. 11. The wife shall maintain the life insurance that she currently has for the benefit of the minor child. 12.


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin Date: 1998-03-10. Machine-draft public headnote: John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

QDRO: East Haven Fire Department is hereby vacated and the order is modified as follows: The defendant is awarded 50% of the accrued benefits due to the plaintiff as of the date of this ruling modifying the judgment. This division shall be accomplished through a qualified Domestic Relations Order or such other documents consistent with the terms of the pension plan. The defendant's counsel shall prepare such documents for the court's consideration as necessary. Dated this 10th day of March, 1998 Barry K. Stevens, Judge


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

pension: RULING ON POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS The plaintiff John Coughlin's Motion to Correct and the defendant Cara Coughlin's Motion to Reopen are both granted to the limited extent that the court reopens and reconsiders its findings and orders regarding the plaintiff's pension from his employment with the East Haven Fire Department. The court's finding that the pension has a value of $49,000 is hereby vacated. The court heard evidence concerning the calculation which would be used to determine the basis and amount of the benefit payable under the plan, but after further review and consideration of this evidence, the court concl


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

domestic relations order: n Fire Department is hereby vacated and the order is modified as follows: The defendant is awarded 50% of the accrued benefits due to the plaintiff as of the date of this ruling modifying the judgment. This division shall be accomplished through a qualified Domestic Relations Order or such other documents consistent with the terms of the pension plan. The defendant's counsel shall prepare such documents for the court's consideration as necessary. Dated this 10th day of March, 1998 Barry K. Stevens, Judge


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin Date: 1998-01-26. Machine-draft public headnote: John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

QDRO: receive full ownership of his electrical business and mutual fund. CT Page 1040 2. The defendant shall receive $20,000 of the plaintiff's pension from his employment with the East Haven Fire Department. This $20,000 division shall be accomplished through a Qualified Domestic Relations Order or such other documents consistent with the terms of the pension plan. The defendant's counsel shall prepare such for the court's consideration as necessary. 3. The defendant shall receive full ownership of the 1988 Lincoln Town car and shall hold the plaintiff harmless for any liabilities or expenses relating to this vehicle. 4. The defendant shall rec


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

pension: iness is almost entirely derived from the plaintiff's own individual skill and goodwill to an extent that the business has little or no value exclusive from his own personal efforts. The plaintiff also has a mutual fund valued at approximately $2,000, and a pension from his employment as a fireman. Although the plaintiff testified that he did not know the value of his pension, on the basis of the limited evidence that the value of the pension is based on the plaintiff's salary, the court finds that the pension has a present value of approximately $49,000. In regard to the defendant, she presently works part time and


John Coughlin v. Cara Coughlin

domestic relations order: ull ownership of his electrical business and mutual fund. CT Page 1040 2. The defendant shall receive $20,000 of the plaintiff's pension from his employment with the East Haven Fire Department. This $20,000 division shall be accomplished through a Qualified Domestic Relations Order or such other documents consistent with the terms of the pension plan. The defendant's counsel shall prepare such for the court's consideration as necessary. 3. The defendant shall receive full ownership of the 1988 Lincoln Town car and shall hold the plaintiff harmless for any liabilities or expenses relating to this vehicle. 4. The defendant shall rec


John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels

John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels Date: 1999-04-29. Machine-draft public headnote: John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels


John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels

QDRO: lf of the Fidelity Rollover retirement account shown on the plaintiff's financial affidavit and one half of the Mass. Mutual IRA shown on the plaintiff's financial affidavit based on their value as of the date this decision is filed. Both to be transferred by QDRO. Counsel for the defendant is responsible for preparing the necessary documents. The court retains jurisdiction over any dispute that may arise involving the documents. 14. The American Skandia annuity shown on the plaintiff's financial affidavit is awarded to the plaintiff. 15. The Mass. Mutual Annuity shown on the defendant's financial affidavit is aw


John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels

retirement benefits: 000 and an equity of $77,000. He owns a 1994 Lincoln with fair market value of $9,000. He has miscellaneous checking and savings accounts with total value of $2,595. He also has a American Skandia Annuity account with a value of $97,934. The Fidelity rollover retirement account shown on his affidavit under the category of stocks, bonds and mutual funds should be under the category of deferred compensation plans. He has health insurance through the Connecticut Pipe Trades Health Fund Local 711. The cost to maintain COBRA benefits for the defendant under that insurance after the dissolution is $200 monthly. CT Page 4417 The plaint


John Daniels v. Madoria Daniels

pension: . 14. The American Skandia annuity shown on the plaintiff's financial affidavit is awarded to the plaintiff. 15. The Mass. Mutual Annuity shown on the defendant's financial affidavit is awarded to the defendant. 16. The defendant is awarded one half the pension plan that the plaintiff is entitled to receive from the State of Connecticut. Counsel for the plaintiff is to prepare the necessary documents to arrange for this transfer and it is to be completed by May 28, 1999. 17. The defendant is awarded one half of whatever shares of stock the plaintiff still owns in US Air. Said transfers to be completed by May 28,


John Heuss v. Patricia Heuss.

John Heuss v. Patricia Heuss. Date: 1991-06-07. Machine-draft public headnote: John Heuss v. Patricia Heuss. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Heuss v. Patricia Heuss.


John Heuss v. Patricia Heuss.

QDRO: r children. 3. The defendant shall be entitled to COBRA benefits as are available through the plaintiff's medical plan for a period of 36 months at the expense of the defendant. Other Property CT Page 5707 1. The defendant wife is awarded, by means of a QDRO, 40% of the plaintiff's vested pension. The court shall retain jurisdiction until the appropriate order is drafted. 2. The plaintiff shall be entitled to and is awarded $22,500 of the remaining $45,000 cash presently held by the defendant. The defendant shall transfer this sum to the plaintiff forthwith. 3. Each party shall retain those assets as listed


John Heuss v. Patricia Heuss.

pension: be entitled to COBRA benefits as are available through the plaintiff's medical plan for a period of 36 months at the expense of the defendant. Other Property CT Page 5707 1. The defendant wife is awarded, by means of a QDRO, 40% of the plaintiff's vested pension. The court shall retain jurisdiction until the appropriate order is drafted. 2. The plaintiff shall be entitled to and is awarded $22,500 of the remaining $45,000 cash presently held by the defendant. The defendant shall transfer this sum to the plaintiff forthwith. 3. Each party shall retain those assets as listed on their respective financial affidavi


John K. Hart v. Ann J. Hart

John K. Hart v. Ann J. Hart Date: 1998-07-10. Machine-draft public headnote: John K. Hart v. Ann J. Hart is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John K. Hart v. Ann J. Hart

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


John K. Hart v. Ann J. Hart

QDRO: ounts, shall belong to the party who has possession or ownership of such property at this time. 4. Deferred Compensation Plans. The husband and the wife shall divide equally the husband's Flex Extra Tax Qualified SEPP and IRA accounts accomplished through a qualified domestic relations order or such other documents consistent with the terms of these accounts. The wife's counsel shall prepare such documents for the court's consideration as necessary. CT Page 7950 5. Life Insurance. The husband shall maintain and pay for the life insurance listed on his financial affidavit naming the minor children as beneficiaries until the youngest child reac


John K. Hart v. Ann J. Hart

domestic relations order: ll belong to the party who has possession or ownership of such property at this time. 4. Deferred Compensation Plans. The husband and the wife shall divide equally the husband's Flex Extra Tax Qualified SEPP and IRA accounts accomplished through a qualified domestic relations order or such other documents consistent with the terms of these accounts. The wife's counsel shall prepare such documents for the court's consideration as necessary. CT Page 7950 5. Life Insurance. The husband shall maintain and pay for the life insurance listed on his financial affidavit naming the minor children as beneficiaries until the youngest child reac


John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski.

John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski. Date: 2000-10-10. Machine-draft public headnote: John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski.

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski.

QDRO: The defendant shall retain her interest in her 401K account. The defendant is awarded a total of $391,779 of the retirement accounts held CT Page 12594 by the plaintiff in order to equalize their retirement accounts. The defendant shall draft, if necessary, a Qualified Domestic Relation Order (QDRO) to effectuate this award. The draft shall be submitted to the plaintiff for his review and to the court for its approval. The court shall retain jurisdiction in order to enforce this provision. 9. The defendant is awarded ownership of the furnishings, equipment and personal property presently located at 119 Hartford Road, Salem, Connecticut, except


John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski.

retirement benefits: of the $33,850 worth of jewelry currently in her possession and her interest in the real property at Captains Beach, New London, Connecticut. 8. The defendant shall retain her interest in her 401K account. The defendant is awarded a total of $391,779 of the retirement accounts held CT Page 12594 by the plaintiff in order to equalize their retirement accounts. The defendant shall draft, if necessary, a Qualified Domestic Relation Order (QDRO) to effectuate this award. The draft shall be submitted to the plaintiff for his review and to the court for its approval. The court shall retain jurisdiction in order to enforce this provisi


John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski.

pension: age gross income that the plaintiff has received from his business over the past three years, I find his current gross income from his dental practice to be $325,000 annually. In addition, the plaintiff receives rental income of $5,980 and income from an army pension of $988 annually. The defendant is fifty-seven years old and she suffers from a disability for which she receives disability income. The defendant has permanent nerve damage from shingles and arthritis. She annually receives disability insurance income in the amount of $24,756 and social security disability income of $12,648. Prior to her disability in 19


John Kozlowski v. Sandra Kozlowski.

401(k): e time of trial are no longer available. Accordingly, in rendering property distribution orders, I have not recognized the relinquishment of those assets by the defendant and have deemed them to be assets available to the defendant. The defendant also has a 401K account with a present value of $91,376, a life insurance policy with a cash value of $6,395 and various bank accounts totaling $10,408. In addition, the defendant recently purchased two items of jewelry with a combined appraised value of $33,850. Finally, the defendant possesses an interest in real estate in New London worth $3,548. In determining the or


John Lescott v. Robin Lescott.

John Lescott v. Robin Lescott. Date: 1991-06-07. Machine-draft public headnote: John Lescott v. Robin Lescott. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Lescott v. Robin Lescott.


John Lescott v. Robin Lescott.

QDRO: the proceeds of the 401K Plan which the plaintiff will receive shortly will provide the plaintiff husband with a stream of income for child support purposes and for maintaining the real CT Page 5692 estate until such time as the husband obtains employment. QDRO Pension Plan The plaintiff shall be entitled to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) with respect to the defendant's New York Daily News Pension Plan in the amount of 30%. The court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter. Life Insurance The husband shall provide and maintain life insurance in the amount of $150,000 with the wife and minor chi


John Lescott v. Robin Lescott.

pension: proceeds of the 401K Plan which the plaintiff will receive shortly will provide the plaintiff husband with a stream of income for child support purposes and for maintaining the real CT Page 5692 estate until such time as the husband obtains employment. QDRO Pension Plan The plaintiff shall be entitled to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) with respect to the defendant's New York Daily News Pension Plan in the amount of 30%. The court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter. Life Insurance The husband shall provide and maintain life insurance in the amount of $150,000 with the wife and minor children no


John Lescott v. Robin Lescott.

401(k): d to her IRA. 2. The defendant wife shall be entitled to the furniture or furnishings contained in the marital home. 3. Each party shall be entitled to the motor vehicle presently in their respective possession. 4. The defendant shall be entitled to his 401K Plan and the remaining assets as noted on his financial affidavit unless otherwise disposed of herein. It is the court's intent that the proceeds of the 401K Plan which the plaintiff will receive shortly will provide the plaintiff husband with a stream of income for child support purposes and for maintaining the real CT Page 5692 estate until such time as t


John Lescott v. Robin Lescott.

domestic relations order: rtly will provide the plaintiff husband with a stream of income for child support purposes and for maintaining the real CT Page 5692 estate until such time as the husband obtains employment. QDRO Pension Plan The plaintiff shall be entitled to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) with respect to the defendant's New York Daily News Pension Plan in the amount of 30%. The court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter. Life Insurance The husband shall provide and maintain life insurance in the amount of $150,000 with the wife and minor children noted as irrevocable beneficiaries thereon, for so long as the plaintiff husband


John M. Gasparine v. Barbara E. Gasparine Date: 1999-01-06. Machine-draft public headnote: John M. Gasparine v. Barbara E. Gasparine is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


QDRO: wife shall retain the funds in the parties' joint savings account and joint checking account. (d) The parties shall divide equally the deferred compensation plans listed on their respective financial affidavits, jointly with rights of survivorship, through Qualified Domestic Relations Orders or such other documents consistent with the terms of these plans. These documents shall be executed by the parties' attorneys for the court to review within sixty days. (e) Except as otherwise ordered herein, the parties shall retain all of the assets in their possession as listed and identified on their respective financial affidavits. CT Page 711 8.


domestic relations order: l retain the funds in the parties' joint savings account and joint checking account. (d) The parties shall divide equally the deferred compensation plans listed on their respective financial affidavits, jointly with rights of survivorship, through Qualified Domestic Relations Orders or such other documents consistent with the terms of these plans. These documents shall be executed by the parties' attorneys for the court to review within sixty days. (e) Except as otherwise ordered herein, the parties shall retain all of the assets in their possession as listed and identified on their respective financial affidavits. CT Page 711 8.


valuation/division: the wife's cohabitation as CT Page 710 defined by statute. (d) The husband shall pay to the wife $10,000 as lump sum alimony which may be applied by the wife against her outstanding attorney fees. This lump sum payment shall be made within sixty days. 7. Property Divisions. (a) The parties shall list for sale the marital home located at 60 Maple Drive, Woodbridge, Connecticut, when the minor child graduates from high school or becomes nineteen years old whichever first occurs. The net proceeds from the sale of the premises shall be split between the parties with the husband receiving 40% and the wife receiving 60% of these


John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk.

John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk. Docket: of years and is well liked and respected. Date: 2002-10-01. Machine-draft public headnote: John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk.


John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk.

QDRO: licies. PENSIONS, IRA ACCOUNTS, 401K ACCOUNTS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNTS The parties shall equally divide all pensions, IRA accounts, 401K accounts and deferred compensation accounts as listed on their respective financial affidavits by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order, if needed. The parties shall equally share in the cost of preparing the necessary documents. Each party shall be awarded joint and survivorship benefits to protect each party in the event of the other's death. The court has taken into consideration Plaintiff's argument that the Wife will collect social security in addition to her share of the Plaintiff's p


John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk.

pension: party shall be awarded joint and survivorship benefits to protect each party in the event of the other's death. The court has taken into consideration Plaintiff's argument that the Wife will collect social security in addition to her share of the Plaintiff's pension. This fact is outweighed by the Wife's far inferior earning capacity and the ability of the Plaintiff, a police officer, to retire well before age 65 and earn a second pension and/or generate social security credit in his name. MEDICAL INSURANCE AND UNREIMBURSED MEDICALS — CHILDREN The Plaintiff shall maintain, at his sole expense, the present med


John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk.

401(k): property of the Husband. The parties shall both provide to the other proof of said insurance on annual bases. Either party may substitute a term life insurance policy with the same face value as above for their current policies. PENSIONS, IRA ACCOUNTS, 401K ACCOUNTS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNTS The parties shall equally divide all pensions, IRA accounts, 401K accounts and deferred compensation accounts as listed on their respective financial affidavits by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order, if needed. The parties shall equally share in the cost of preparing the necessary documents. Each part


John Newkirk v. Melanie Newkirk.

domestic relations order: PENSIONS, IRA ACCOUNTS, 401K ACCOUNTS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION ACCOUNTS The parties shall equally divide all pensions, IRA accounts, 401K accounts and deferred compensation accounts as listed on their respective financial affidavits by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order, if needed. The parties shall equally share in the cost of preparing the necessary documents. Each party shall be awarded joint and survivorship benefits to protect each party in the event of the other's death. The court has taken into consideration Plaintiff's argument that the Wife will collect social security in addition to her share of the Plaintiff's p


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec. Date: 2000-11-28. Machine-draft public headnote: John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

QDRO: nsfer to the defendant 40% of the value of his IRA plan at Selbert and Co. and 401k plan at Konica, Inc. as of August 30, 2000, the date of the court1s decision dissolving the marriage of the parties. Said transfer shall be effectuated by an assignment and/or Qualified Domestic Relations Order as required by the plan administrator. Both parties are ordered to sign any documents necessary to effectuate said transfer. The provisions of this paragraph encompass a property order and not alimony. The court shall retain jurisdictions to carry out the provision of this paragraph. 6. AUTOMOBILES Each party shall have all right, title and interest in


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

401(k): items of personal property from the family residence. 4. SERP PLAN The plaintiff shall have all right, title and interest in and to the Serp Plan valued in the approximate amount of $4,100.00 as of the date of the dissolution of the marriage. 5. IRA AND 401K PLANS The plaintiff is hereby ordered to transfer to the defendant 40% of the value of his IRA plan at Selbert and Co. and 401k plan at Konica, Inc. as of August 30, 2000, the date of the court1s decision dissolving the marriage of the parties. Said transfer shall be effectuated by an assignment and/or Qualified Domestic Relations Order as required by the


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

domestic relations order: he defendant 40% of the value of his IRA plan at Selbert and Co. and 401k plan at Konica, Inc. as of August 30, 2000, the date of the court1s decision dissolving the marriage of the parties. Said transfer shall be effectuated by an assignment and/or Qualified Domestic Relations Order as required by the plan administrator. Both parties are ordered to sign any documents necessary to effectuate said transfer. The provisions of this paragraph encompass a property order and not alimony. The court shall retain jurisdictions to carry out the provision of this paragraph. 6. AUTOMOBILES Each party shall have all right, title and interest in


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec. Date: 2000-11-17. Machine-draft public headnote: John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

QDRO: nsfer to the defendant 40% of the value of his IRA plan at Selbert and Co. and 401k plan at Konica, Inc. as of August 30, 2000, the date of the court's decision dissolving the marriage of the parties. Said transfer shall be effectuated by an assignment and/or Qualified Domestic Relations Order as required by the plan administrator. Both parties are ordered to sign any documents necessary to effectuate said transfer. The provisions of this paragraph encompass a property order and not alimony. The court shall retain jurisdictions to carry out the provision of this paragraph. 6. AUTOMOBILES Each party shall have all right, title and interest in


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

401(k): items of personal property from the family residence. 4. SERP PLAN The plaintiff shall have all right, title and interest in and to the Serp Plan valued in the approximate amount of $4,100.00 as of the date of the dissolution of the marriage. 5. IRA AND 401K PLANS The plaintiff is hereby ordered to transfer to the defendant 40% of the value of his IRA plan at Selbert and Co. and 401k plan at Konica, Inc. as of August 30, 2000, the date of the court's decision dissolving the marriage of the parties. Said transfer shall be effectuated by an assignment and/or Qualified Domestic Relations Order as required by the


John P. Havanec v. Mary Ellen Havanec.

domestic relations order: he defendant 40% of the value of his IRA plan at Selbert and Co. and 401k plan at Konica, Inc. as of August 30, 2000, the date of the court's decision dissolving the marriage of the parties. Said transfer shall be effectuated by an assignment and/or Qualified Domestic Relations Order as required by the plan administrator. Both parties are ordered to sign any documents necessary to effectuate said transfer. The provisions of this paragraph encompass a property order and not alimony. The court shall retain jurisdictions to carry out the provision of this paragraph. 6. AUTOMOBILES Each party shall have all right, title and interest in


John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher

John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher Date: 1999-03-09. Machine-draft public headnote: John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher


John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher

QDRO: to the court for final determination if mediation is unsuccessful. Any items not removed by the Wife within 60 days from date shall be considered abandoned. RETIREMENT ASSETS The Husband shall transfer to the Wife, from his Cargill 401k plan, pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order prepared by his counsel, the sum of $10,000. Said transfer is to be without tax consequences to either party. In the event the Wife must establish an IRA to receive said funds, she shall do so without delay. CT Page 2956 LIABILITIES The balance due on the two First Union obligations and the Chase Visa credit card shall be paid by the Husband out of the p


John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher

401(k): graduate. She attended college for 3 months and has a real estate license. During the trial, the Husband testified that he brought into the marriage a Prudential Securities stock brokerage account containing $184,245.76 (Plaintiff's Exhibit D) and a Cargill 401k plan account with a balance of approximately $68,000 (no documentation of that account at the time of the marriage was produced). As of January 31, 1999, the balance in the Prudential account was $9,652.38 (Plaintiff's Exhibit E) and, as of December 31, 1998, the balance in the 401k account was $101,104.60 (Plaintiff's Exhibit L). The money brought into the


John Robert Mosher v. Alexandra Mosher

domestic relations order: rt for final determination if mediation is unsuccessful. Any items not removed by the Wife within 60 days from date shall be considered abandoned. RETIREMENT ASSETS The Husband shall transfer to the Wife, from his Cargill 401k plan, pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order prepared by his counsel, the sum of $10,000. Said transfer is to be without tax consequences to either party. In the event the Wife must establish an IRA to receive said funds, she shall do so without delay. CT Page 2956 LIABILITIES The balance due on the two First Union obligations and the Chase Visa credit card shall be paid by the Husband out of the p


Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis

Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis Date: 1999-10-26. Machine-draft public headnote: Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis


Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis

QDRO: and handle the debt thereon. The defendant may retain her personal belongings including her fur coat and jewelry. CT Page 14253 The defendant shall receive and have 30% of the current vested value of the plaintiffs Kendland pension and retirement plan by QDRO. The Court enters no orders as to attorney's fees, for each party shall be responsible for their own. Each party shall be responsible for any debts remaining after the application of the $10,000.00 as shown on their financial affidavits. The marriage of the parties is dissolved on the basis of irretrievable breakdown and the parties are declared to be


Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis

retirement benefits: s total debt of $37,727.00. CT Page 14248 The plaintiff shows a 0 equity in the premises known as 16 Oak Street in Norwich and a negative equity in a 1995 Dodge Caravan motor vehicle. The plaintiff reflects the $31,696.00 in the escrow account, values his retirement plan at $9,182.00 and his Kendland pension plan at $25,155.00. From the health form the Court finds that this was the first marriage for both parties and that the education of each extended through completing high school. Discussion This is a marriage of 7 years. As indicated, the first marriage for both. The marriage has resulted in three small children;


Jon Guzallis v. Elizabeth Guzallis

pension: as offered to the court as concerns either the liquidated property at Plain Hill Road or the property still remaining in the name of the plaintiff at 16 Oak Street in Norwich. It is the position of the defendant that she is entitled to 50% of the plaintiffs pension benefits which will be vested in CT Page 14245 January of the year 2000. The defendant presently has health insurance incident to her employment with Big Y and indicated to the Court that the children could be provided for under that umbrella of insurance. The defendant's sole means of transportation at this time is a 1989 Ford Tempo, which she values a


Jordana Elrom v. Elad Elrom

Jordana Elrom v. Elad Elrom Citation: 439 N.J. Super. 424. Extracted reporter citation: 439 N.J. Super. 424. Docket: A-4565-12T4 JORDANA ELROM. Date: 2015-02-23. Machine-draft public headnote: Jordana Elrom v. Elad Elrom is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to family-law retirement/property division context. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Jordana Elrom v. Elad Elrom

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 1/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Jordana Elrom v. Elad Elrom

opening text: NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4565-12T4 JORDANA ELROM, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, February 23, 2015 v. APPELLATE DIVISION ELAD ELROM, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted November 3, 2014 - Decided February 23, 2015 Before Judges Lihotz, St. John and Rothstadt. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FM-02-2214-11. Townsend, Tomaio & Newmark, LLC, attorneys for appellant (John E. Clancy, on the briefs). Jordana Elrom, respondent pro se. The opinion of the c


Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch

Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch Date: 2000-02-01. Machine-draft public headnote: Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to ERISA / defined contribution issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch

QDRO: tled to the 1998 Buick motor vehicle and shall be solely responsible for the loan thereon. 5. The plaintiff shall be entitled to his G.D.C. stock options. PENSIONS 1. The wife shall be entitled to 40% of the husband's 401(k), to be secured by means of a QDRO. 2. The wife shall be entitled to her 403b account and her State of Connecticut teacher's retirement account. LIFE INSURANCE 1. The plaintiff shall continue to maintain the life insurances as set forth on his financial affidavit and shall name the minor child as an irrevocable beneficiary thereon for so long as he has an obligation for child support.


Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch

retirement benefits: he plaintiff shall be entitled to his G.D.C. stock options. PENSIONS 1. The wife shall be entitled to 40% of the husband's 401(k), to be secured by means of a QDRO. 2. The wife shall be entitled to her 403b account and her State of Connecticut teacher's retirement account. LIFE INSURANCE 1. The plaintiff shall continue to maintain the life insurances as set forth on his financial affidavit and shall name the minor child as an irrevocable beneficiary thereon for so long as he has an obligation for child support. This provision shall be modifiable. 2. The defendant shall continue to maintain the life insurances as set fo


Joseph Birch v. Ann Birch

401(k): le. 4. The defendant shall be entitled to the 1998 Buick motor vehicle and shall be solely responsible for the loan thereon. 5. The plaintiff shall be entitled to his G.D.C. stock options. PENSIONS 1. The wife shall be entitled to 40% of the husband's 401(k), to be secured by means of a QDRO. 2. The wife shall be entitled to her 403b account and her State of Connecticut teacher's retirement account. LIFE INSURANCE 1. The plaintiff shall continue to maintain the life insurances as set forth on his financial affidavit and shall name the minor child as an irrevocable beneficiary thereon for so long as he has


Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya

Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya Date: 2001-12-13. Machine-draft public headnote: Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya


Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya

QDRO: that husband's retirement benefits would be divided equally between the parties based on a coverture formula, with wife named as a surviving spouse with the right to receive benefits for her lifetime, based upon her life expectancy. Wife filed a motion for a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), asking the court to allow her to take her benefits by way of a qualified joint and survivor annuity. Husband objected, saying that the retirement plan does not permit wife to take her retirement benefits by way of a qualified joint and survivor annuity, and that if wife were granted this annuity, he would lose the right to take his pension in a lump


Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya

retirement benefits: m the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas and appellant's brief. Appellant-husband Joseph Kostya and wife Barbara Kostya were granted a divorce, the terms of which were taken from a separation agreement between the parties. The parties agreed that husband's retirement benefits would be divided equally between the parties based on a coverture formula, with wife named as a surviving spouse with the right to receive benefits for her lifetime, based upon her life expectancy. Wife filed a motion for a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), asking the court to allow her to take her benefits by way of a qualified joint and survivor


Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya

pension: oint and survivor annuity. Husband objected, saying that the retirement plan does not permit wife to take her retirement benefits by way of a qualified joint and survivor annuity, and that if wife were granted this annuity, he would lose the right to take his pension in a lump sum payment. The magistrate found that two post retirement benefits were possible under the circumstances. The first was the joint and survivorship approach where the participant is required to elect benefits under a reduced joint and survivor annuity. The second approach divides the annuity into two distinct components, and the alternate payee


Joseph Kostya v. Barbara Kostya

alternate payee: e possible under the circumstances. The first was the joint and survivorship approach where the participant is required to elect benefits under a reduced joint and survivor annuity. The second approach divides the annuity into two distinct components, and the alternate payee is entitled to a share of the pension benefits based on life expectancy. The magistrate went on to find that neither party presented evidence showing which type of survivorship benefits were available under husband's pension plan. Without this evidence, the magistrate found the court could not adopt a QDRO. Husband filed unopposed objections to the magist


Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia

Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia Date: 1998-02-10. Machine-draft public headnote: Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia


Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia

QDRO: om the date this decision is filed. 10. The court awards to the defendant 25 percent of the CT Page 1768 pension benefit to which the plaintiff is entitled from his employment at Pepsi Cola, Inc., as of the date he retires. This division is to take place by QDRO that is to be prepared by counsel for the defendant. The court retains jurisdiction over any dispute that may arise involving the language of the QDRO. D. BY WAY OF ATTORNEY'S FEES 1. No attorney's are awarded in favor of either party. E. PENDENTE LITE ORDERS 1. All pendente lite orders remain in effect until the date this decision is filed. Any arr


Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia

retirement benefits: life and accidental death. If she retires from Grolier, Inc. on her normal retirement date of March 1, 2028, her estimated projected lifetime monthly retirement income is $504.90. Her estimated monthly social security is $656. In order to be vested under the retirement plan, she has to have five years of service and she is therefore vested. If her employment ends before retirement, she will receive beginning at age sixty-five the benefit she has earned under the plan. She can elect to receive her benefit as early as age fifty-five. Benefits received prior to age sixty-five would be reduced. As of April 30, 1997, her accrued mo


Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia

pension: plaintiff presently leases a 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlas. The lease calls for twenty-four monthly payments of $294.19, each commencing August 29, 1996. The plaintiff paid down $3265 on the lease at the time of signing. The plaintiff's financial affidavit shows a pension plan with Pepsi Cola with a value of $5361. That value was obtained from his employer in approximately August of 1997. The plaintiff is vested in that plan. At age sixty-five, on August 1, 2027, the plaintiff would have the option of either choosing a single lump sum payment estimated at $427,800 or choosing an annual income option. The plaintiff's monthl


Joseph v. Raia v. Valerie Anne Raia

valuation/division: 00 to $1000 monthly if she were to rent an apartment. That amount would include utilities. This court has considered the provision of § 46b-82 regarding the issue of alimony, and has considered the provision of § 46b-81 (c) regarding the issue of property division, and has considered the provision of § 46b-62 regarding the issue of attorney's fees. The court enters the following orders. A. BY WAY OF DISSOLUTION 1. The marriage between the parties is dissolved, and each party is declared to be single and unmarried. B. BY WAY OF ALIMONY 1. The plaintiff is ordered to pay to the defendant alimony in the sum


Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill

Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill Date: 1997-10-22. Machine-draft public headnote: Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill


Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill

QDRO: and payable on October 31, 1998; 3. Periodic alimony to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in the amount of CT Page 10536 $100.00 per week commencing November 1, 1997, to terminate on the death of either party or remarriage of the plaintiff; 4. By qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), the plaintiff is entitled to 50% of the value of the defendant's pension with IBM, valued as of September 30, 1997. The court shall retain jurisdiction over the provision for purposes of its effectuation. 5. The plaintiff has restored to her, her prior name of Joyce Ethel Clancy. 6. Each party shall pay the debts shown or their respective financ


Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill

pension: davits. Mr. Burrill had worked at IBM for 25 years, leaving in 1988, two years after marriage. He left with a severance pay of $250,000.00. None of that was shared with the plaintiff. The only asset of consequence remaining to the parties is the defendant's pension. While no evidence of current value has been presented, it will apparently pay out at $1600 per month when the defendant is 65 years old. The court, having considered the evidence and the statutory criteria for the dissolution of marriage award of counsel fees, and the alimony (C.G.S. § 46b-82 ) and assignment of the marital estate (C.G.S. § 46b


Joyce Ethel Burrill v. Eugene Burrill

domestic relations order: le on October 31, 1998; 3. Periodic alimony to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in the amount of CT Page 10536 $100.00 per week commencing November 1, 1997, to terminate on the death of either party or remarriage of the plaintiff; 4. By qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), the plaintiff is entitled to 50% of the value of the defendant's pension with IBM, valued as of September 30, 1997. The court shall retain jurisdiction over the provision for purposes of its effectuation. 5. The plaintiff has restored to her, her prior name of Joyce Ethel Clancy. 6. Each party shall pay the debts shown or their respective financ


Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen

Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen Date: 1993-04-01. Machine-draft public headnote: Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen

QDRO: e wife is in occupancy exceeding $250 is to be paid by the husband but reimbursed to him out of the closing proceeds before the net proceeds are divided. Any repair under $250 shall be the sole and exclusive responsibility of the wife. 7. The court issues a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) assigning to the wife $64,000 from the husband's Pfizer Savings and Investment Plan. The wife's attorney is to prepare a savings and investment plan (QDRO) for the court's signature. The court retains jurisdiction. 8. The court issues a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) assigning to the wife 20% of the husband's accrued benefit in the Pfize


Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen

pension: saved no money, but the husband was saving through his Pfizer Plans. During the course of the marriage the husband did a substantial amount of traveling. He was away 40% to 50% of the time as his job called for traveling. The wife has a masters degree with no pension and no insurance and no benefits in her current job. The court has taken into consideration all of the statutory criteria under 46b-81 , the assignment of property and transfer of title statute; 46b-82 , the alimony statute and 46b-62 , the attorney's fee statute in making these orders. In addition, the court has taken into consideration the testimony of


Joyce Jensen v. Dennis Jensen

domestic relations order: in occupancy exceeding $250 is to be paid by the husband but reimbursed to him out of the closing proceeds before the net proceeds are divided. Any repair under $250 shall be the sole and exclusive responsibility of the wife. 7. The court issues a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) assigning to the wife $64,000 from the husband's Pfizer Savings and Investment Plan. The wife's attorney is to prepare a savings and investment plan (QDRO) for the court's signature. The court retains jurisdiction. 8. The court issues a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) assigning to the wife 20% of the husband's accrued benefit in the Pfize


Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn.

Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn. Date: 2001-10-16. Machine-draft public headnote: Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn.


Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn.

QDRO: ch party shall execute any necessary documents to transfer title of said automobile to the other party and bear the expenses of ownership of their automobile and hold the other harmless therefrom. 8. The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order 50% of the present value of the defendant's pension plan at General Dynamics. He shall also transfer to the plaintiff $50,000.00 of his General Dynamics, Electric Boat SSIP order. The above shall be by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared by plaintiff's attorney. The plaintiff shall be responsible for any tax consequences fr


Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn.

pension: bile to the other party and bear the expenses of ownership of their automobile and hold the other harmless therefrom. 8. The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order 50% of the present value of the defendant's pension plan at General Dynamics. He shall also transfer to the plaintiff $50,000.00 of his General Dynamics, Electric Boat SSIP order. The above shall be by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared by plaintiff's attorney. The plaintiff shall be responsible for any tax consequences from said transfers. The parties shall share equally t


Judith Kuhn v. Mark Kuhn.

domestic relations order: hall execute any necessary documents to transfer title of said automobile to the other party and bear the expenses of ownership of their automobile and hold the other harmless therefrom. 8. The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order 50% of the present value of the defendant's pension plan at General Dynamics. He shall also transfer to the plaintiff $50,000.00 of his General Dynamics, Electric Boat SSIP order. The above shall be by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared by plaintiff's attorney. The plaintiff shall be responsible for any tax consequences fr


Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin

Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin Date: 1991-11-15. Machine-draft public headnote: Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin


Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin

QDRO: limited to mortgage, taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and upkeep. 2. The plaintiff shall receive a fifty (50%) percent interest in and to the defendant's pension plan with Sterling Drug, Inc., including the basic and supplemental benefit, and that a Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall enter to effectuate the division of the pension plan. 3. The plaintiff shall receive fifty (50%) interest in and to the defendant's 401K with Sterling Drug, Inc., and that a Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall enter to effectuate the division of the 401K. 4. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an amount equal to one-third (1/3) of any an


Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin

pension: t's 401K plan had a value of $128,000 on that date. The defendant has an IRA with a value of $22,000 and the plaintiff's IRA has a value of $6,000. Finally, there is a life insurance policy with a present cash surrender value of approximately $6,000.00. The pension plan is fully vested. It provides a lifetime pension benefit: $2,400 per month attributable to the basic plan and $1,200 per month attributable to a supplemental plan allowed in conjunction with the defendant's severance contract. The defendant owns a one-half unit in a tax shelter plan, Warren Properties Limited Partnership, which appears to have no pres


Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin

401(k): t the home has a present market value of $340,000. There is a stock portfolio with a valuation as of April 30, 1991 of $412,814. CT Page 9798 The value of the deferred compensation plan previously mentioned was $151,892 as of March 15, 1991. The defendant's 401K plan had a value of $128,000 on that date. The defendant has an IRA with a value of $22,000 and the plaintiff's IRA has a value of $6,000. Finally, there is a life insurance policy with a present cash surrender value of approximately $6,000.00. The pension plan is fully vested. It provides a lifetime pension benefit: $2,400 per month attributable to the b


Judith Rodwin v. Roger Rodwin

domestic relations order: mortgage, taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and upkeep. 2. The plaintiff shall receive a fifty (50%) percent interest in and to the defendant's pension plan with Sterling Drug, Inc., including the basic and supplemental benefit, and that a Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall enter to effectuate the division of the pension plan. 3. The plaintiff shall receive fifty (50%) interest in and to the defendant's 401K with Sterling Drug, Inc., and that a Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall enter to effectuate the division of the 401K. 4. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an amount equal to one-third (1/3) of any an


June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman

June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman Date: 1995-07-14. Machine-draft public headnote: June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman


June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman

QDRO: nd the current mortgage shall be paid. The net proceeds shall be equally divided between the parties. (4) The stock investments and Cornerstone bank accounts shall be split equally between the parties. (5) The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) or other appropriate instrument, fifty (50%) percent of his retirement and annuity plans, valued as of June 30, 1995. In the interim, while the documentation is being processed for the transfer, the defendant shall do nothing to impair said plans, or withdraw funds therefrom. The court retains jurisdiction to modify the QDRO to comply with federal or


June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman

pension: nterim, while the documentation is being processed for the transfer, the defendant shall do nothing to impair said plans, or withdraw funds therefrom. The court retains jurisdiction to modify the QDRO to comply with federal or state law relating to retirement/pension plans. (6) The defendant is awarded his Ford automobile, his motorcycle and his credit union bank account. (7) The parties shall divide their personal property, not covered herein, by agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to decide this issue if the parties fail to agree. (8) The defendant shall maintain his present health insurance policy for th


June C. Borgman v. Daniel H. Borgman

domestic relations order: rent mortgage shall be paid. The net proceeds shall be equally divided between the parties. (4) The stock investments and Cornerstone bank accounts shall be split equally between the parties. (5) The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) or other appropriate instrument, fifty (50%) percent of his retirement and annuity plans, valued as of June 30, 1995. In the interim, while the documentation is being processed for the transfer, the defendant shall do nothing to impair said plans, or withdraw funds therefrom. The court retains jurisdiction to modify the QDRO to comply with federal or


Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel

Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel Date: 1995-04-24. Machine-draft public headnote: Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.


Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel

QDRO: . One-half of Stansbury and Prime $ 570 Financial Securities The defendant shall execute all documents required to transfer any interests he may own in the assets awarded to the plaintiff. CT Page 4276 (8) The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), fifty (50%) percent of his Price Waterhouse IRA and retirement plans, valued as stipulated by the parties to be $33,233 for the IRA plan and $72,270 for the retirement plan. In the interim, while the documentation is being processed for the transfer, the defendant shall do nothing to impair said plans, or withdraw funds therefrom. The court shall re


Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel

retirement benefits: documents required to transfer any interests he may own in the assets awarded to the plaintiff. CT Page 4276 (8) The defendant shall transfer to the plaintiff, by Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), fifty (50%) percent of his Price Waterhouse IRA and retirement plans, valued as stipulated by the parties to be $33,233 for the IRA plan and $72,270 for the retirement plan. In the interim, while the documentation is being processed for the transfer, the defendant shall do nothing to impair said plans, or withdraw funds therefrom. The court shall retain jurisdiction to modify the QDRO to comply with federal or state law rel


Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel

pension: g values of their assets: A. Escrow proceeds from sale of 40 Shields Road, Darien property (approx.) $505,000 B. People's Bank Accounts (approx.) $ 13,600 C. Interest in Vermont property $ 16,000 D. Stamford Yacht Club Bond $ 2,500 E. Retirement and Pension Plans (approx.) 1. Gemini 401K $ 500 2. Price Waterhouse 401K $33,233 3. Price Waterhouse retirement $72,270 $106,000 F. Coins (approx.) $ 2,700 G. Gold Stocks (approx.) $ 150 H. Stansbury and Prime Financial $ 1,140 Securities (approx.) ------------ Total $647,090 (5) From the escrow funds, the following debts shall be paid: A. 2 joint Visa b


Karen Gabriel v. James Gabriel

401(k): w proceeds from sale of 40 Shields Road, Darien property (approx.) $505,000 B. People's Bank Accounts (approx.) $ 13,600 C. Interest in Vermont property $ 16,000 D. Stamford Yacht Club Bond $ 2,500 E. Retirement and Pension Plans (approx.) 1. Gemini 401K $ 500 2. Price Waterhouse 401K $33,233 3. Price Waterhouse retirement $72,270 $106,000 F. Coins (approx.) $ 2,700 G. Gold Stocks (approx.) $ 150 H. Stansbury and Prime Financial $ 1,140 Securities (approx.) ------------ Total $647,090 (5) From the escrow funds, the following debts shall be paid: A. 2 joint Visa bills $ 11,700 B. 2 Household cr


Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi

Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi Date: 1997-02-04. Machine-draft public headnote: Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi


Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi

QDRO: % of any gross bonus the defendant receives. Said sum shall be paid to the plaintiff within 30 days of the receipt of same by the defendant. Pension Plan 401(K) 1. The defendant shall assign a 50% interest of his 401(K) plan to the plaintiff by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. 2. The defendant shall assign a 50% interest in his Pension plan to the plaintiff by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. Tax Exemption 1. The defendant shall be entitled to claim the three minor children as exemptions for Income tax purposes, so long as the CT Page 1156 plaintiff is unemployed and provided the defendant is current with the


Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi

pension: ion is strained, to say the least. Neither appear to understand the meaning of true and accurate affidavits and the meaning of an oath. The marital home jointly owned by the parties has a negative equity. CT Page 1153 The defendant has a 401(K) plan and a pension at his place of employment. At a pendente lite hearing, the defendant was ordered to advise the plaintiff through counsel when he received his bonus for 1996 and the amount thereof. The defendant failed to advise the plaintiff that he received a bonus of $25,000 for 1996. The defendant testified his net bonus was $16,000. He testified he used $8,000 for b


Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi

401(k): his female companion is strained, to say the least. Neither appear to understand the meaning of true and accurate affidavits and the meaning of an oath. The marital home jointly owned by the parties has a negative equity. CT Page 1153 The defendant has a 401(K) plan and a pension at his place of employment. At a pendente lite hearing, the defendant was ordered to advise the plaintiff through counsel when he received his bonus for 1996 and the amount thereof. The defendant failed to advise the plaintiff that he received a bonus of $25,000 for 1996. The defendant testified his net bonus was $16,000. He testified h


Karen Lombardi v. John Lombardi

domestic relations order: ross bonus the defendant receives. Said sum shall be paid to the plaintiff within 30 days of the receipt of same by the defendant. Pension Plan 401(K) 1. The defendant shall assign a 50% interest of his 401(K) plan to the plaintiff by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. 2. The defendant shall assign a 50% interest in his Pension plan to the plaintiff by means of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. Tax Exemption 1. The defendant shall be entitled to claim the three minor children as exemptions for Income tax purposes, so long as the CT Page 1156 plaintiff is unemployed and provided the defendant is current with the


Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy

Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy Date: 1994-10-28. Machine-draft public headnote: Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.


Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy


Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy

QDRO: tal insurance for the minor child as available though his employment. All uninsured medical and dental bills shall be divided equally. These orders are entered subject to Connecticut General Statutes, Sec. 46b-84c. 6. The defendant shall receive by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order 22 percent of plaintiff's pension valued as of the date of this judgment. CT Page 11040 7. The plaintiff shall pay the sum of $500 within 60 days toward payment of the defendant's legal fees. 8. The husband shall name the child as irrevocable beneficiary of all existing life insurance policies for so long as he is obligated to support said child. 9. T


Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy

pension: loyment. All uninsured medical and dental bills shall be divided equally. These orders are entered subject to Connecticut General Statutes, Sec. 46b-84c. 6. The defendant shall receive by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order 22 percent of plaintiff's pension valued as of the date of this judgment. CT Page 11040 7. The plaintiff shall pay the sum of $500 within 60 days toward payment of the defendant's legal fees. 8. The husband shall name the child as irrevocable beneficiary of all existing life insurance policies for so long as he is obligated to support said child. 9. The husband shall be entitled to cl


Karl W. Murphy v. Linda S. Murphy

domestic relations order: nce for the minor child as available though his employment. All uninsured medical and dental bills shall be divided equally. These orders are entered subject to Connecticut General Statutes, Sec. 46b-84c. 6. The defendant shall receive by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order 22 percent of plaintiff's pension valued as of the date of this judgment. CT Page 11040 7. The plaintiff shall pay the sum of $500 within 60 days toward payment of the defendant's legal fees. 8. The husband shall name the child as irrevocable beneficiary of all existing life insurance policies for so long as he is obligated to support said child. 9. T


Kathryn A. Colandrea v. Dennis Colandrea Date: 1999-02-08. Machine-draft public headnote: Kathryn A. Colandrea v. Dennis Colandrea is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.