← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.

January 16, 1991 · US

Extracted case name
John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton.
Extracted reporter citation
pending
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 5/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: John C. Carlton, Sr. v. Ann Carlton. is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: pension / defined benefit issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

le through his employment for as long as the law allows or for as long as any benefit or pension plan allows, whichever is longer, at her expense. 6. Twenty-five percent of the husband's pension at Pratt and Whitney shall be conveyed to the wife by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared for approval by the Court by defendant's counsel. The pension benefit to be allocated shall be determined by multiplying the husband's total pension benefit at the time he retires by a fraction consisting of a denominator equal to the husband's total years of credit as a Plan participant and a numerator of 18. 7. The issue of perso

pension

balance on or before April 15, 1994. The award of property shall be effective upon the plaintiff's execution of the mortgage note and deed. 3. The defendant is awarded one hundred percent of the survivor (contingent) annuity provided for in the plaintiff's pension plan, and shall remain beneficiary of any death benefit of the pension for her lifetime. 4. The plaintiff shall pay to the defendant as alimony $100.00 per week until the death of either party or the defendant's remarriage. 5. The plaintiff shall cooperate in maintaining the defendant on the medical insurance plan available through his employment for as

domestic relations order

his employment for as long as the law allows or for as long as any benefit or pension plan allows, whichever is longer, at her expense. 6. Twenty-five percent of the husband's pension at Pratt and Whitney shall be conveyed to the wife by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared for approval by the Court by defendant's counsel. The pension benefit to be allocated shall be determined by multiplying the husband's total pension benefit at the time he retires by a fraction consisting of a denominator equal to the husband's total years of credit as a Plan participant and a numerator of 18. 7. The issue of perso

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
pending
Generated at
May 14, 2026
View public source on courtlistener.com

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] 
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
The parties were married on February 15, 1958 at New Haven, Connecticut. 
 All jurisdictional requirements have been met. 
 The marriage of the parties has broken down irretrievably and the same is hereby dissolved. 
 The court has considered the statutory criteria contained in Connecticut General Statutes 46b-81 and 46b-82 and enters the following orders: 
 1. All right, title and interest in the property located at CT Page 733 474 Huntington Street, New Haven, is awarded to the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall be responsible for all outstanding mortgages, liens and encumbrances on the property as well as taxes, insurance, and all costs associated with ownership and maintenance of the property. He shall indemnify and hold the defendant harmless thereon. 
 2. The plaintiff shall execute a mortgage note and deed in favor of the defendant in the amount of $42,000, payable in the following manner: $30,000 on or before April 15, 1991 and the balance on or before April 15, 1994. The award of property shall be effective upon the plaintiff's execution of the mortgage note and deed. 
 3. The defendant is awarded one hundred percent of the survivor (contingent) annuity provided for in the plaintiff's pension plan, and shall remain beneficiary of any death benefit of the pension for her lifetime. 
 4. The plaintiff shall pay to the defendant as alimony $100.00 per week until the death of either party or the defendant's remarriage. 
 5. The plaintiff shall cooperate in maintaining the defendant on the medical insurance plan available through his employment for as long as the law allows or for as long as any benefit or pension plan allows, whichever is longer, at her expense. 
 6. Twenty-five percent of the husband's pension at Pratt and Whitney shall be conveyed to the wife by way of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared for approval by the Court by defendant's counsel. The pension benefit to be allocated shall be determined by multiplying the husband's total pension benefit at the time he retires by a fraction consisting of a denominator equal to the husband's total years of credit as a Plan participant and a numerator of 18. 
 7. The issue of personal property is referred to the Family Relations Office for mediation and the court retains jurisdiction over the issue of personal property. 
 8. The defendant shall vacate the Huntington Street property no later than February 15, 1991. 
 By the Court 
 ELAINE E. GORDON, JUDGE CT Page 734