LexyCorpus case page
MacOmber v. MacOmber
Citation: 814 A.2d 456 · January 7, 2003 · US
- Extracted case name
- MacOmber v. MacOmber
- Extracted reporter citation
- 814 A.2d 456
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: MacOmber v. MacOmber is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to family-law retirement/property division context. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 1/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: family-law retirement/property division context
Evidence quotes
opening text“814 A.2d 456 (2003) 2003 ME 1 Steven MACOMBER v. Roxanne MACOMBER. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 9, 2002. Decided: January 7, 2003. Donald J. Gasink (orally), Augusta, for plaintiff. David S. Abramson (orally), Givertz, Lunt, Hambley, Schefee & Abramson, P.A., Portland, for defendant. Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J. and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ. DANA, J. [¶ 1] Roxanne Macomber appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Ellsworth, Staples, J. ), contending that the court erred in determining Steven Macomber's income and abused its discretion in its award of general and transitional support. She asserts that the cour”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- reporter: 814 A.2d 456
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
814 A.2d 456 (2003) 2003 ME 1 Steven MACOMBER v. Roxanne MACOMBER. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 9, 2002. Decided: January 7, 2003. Donald J. Gasink (orally), Augusta, for plaintiff. David S. Abramson (orally), Givertz, Lunt, Hambley, Schefee & Abramson, P.A., Portland, for defendant. Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J. and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ. DANA, J. [¶ 1] Roxanne Macomber appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (Ellsworth, Staples, J. ), contending that the court erred in determining Steven Macomber's income and abused its discretion in its award of general and transitional support. She asserts that the court erred in failing adequately to consider the impact of her physical disability on her work capacity and in finding Steven had not committed economic misconduct. Because we conclude that the court erred in its calculation of Steven's income, we vacate the judgment in part and remand to the District Court for reconsideration of its award of spousal support. [¶ 2] The parties were married in 1972 when Roxanne turned eighteen. They have six children, all of whom are now adults. Steven graduated from college and became an engineer, working away from home at least seventy-five percent of the time. Roxanne was a homemaker throughout the marriage and has held temporary or part-time employment in *457 minimum wage jobs over the past few years. Steven filed for a divorce in 1998.