← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

Rathblott v. Rathblott

January 13, 1999 · US

Extracted case name
Rathblott v. Rathblott
Extracted reporter citation
pending
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 5/5Family-law relevance 2/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: Rathblott v. Rathblott is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 2/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: pension / defined benefit issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

s a fair market value of $250,000 and should be awarded to the Wife. C. The Mead Condo I has a fair market value of $135,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. D. The Mead Condo II shall be sold upon terms and conditions to be set by the court. E. By QDRO or other appropriate court order, each party should be awarded one-half of each of the following as of the date of distribution: 1. Husband's IRA 2. Baker Pension 3. Fidelity Annuity 4. Husband's 401(k). F. The Husband's business (ERC) has a fair market of $196,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. G. The Wife's Automobile has a fair market

pension

D. The Mead Condo II shall be sold upon terms and conditions to be set by the court. E. By QDRO or other appropriate court order, each party should be awarded one-half of each of the following as of the date of distribution: 1. Husband's IRA 2. Baker Pension 3. Fidelity Annuity 4. Husband's 401(k). F. The Husband's business (ERC) has a fair market of $196,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. G. The Wife's Automobile has a fair market value of $30,000 and should be awarded to Wife. H. The Husband's Automobile has a fair market value of $7,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. I. Pursuit to t

401(k)

rms and conditions to be set by the court. E. By QDRO or other appropriate court order, each party should be awarded one-half of each of the following as of the date of distribution: 1. Husband's IRA 2. Baker Pension 3. Fidelity Annuity 4. Husband's 401(k). F. The Husband's business (ERC) has a fair market of $196,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. G. The Wife's Automobile has a fair market value of $30,000 and should be awarded to Wife. H. The Husband's Automobile has a fair market value of $7,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. I. Pursuit to the stipulation dated September 8, 1998 the p

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
pending
Generated at
May 14, 2026
View public source on courtlistener.com

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Trial Stipulation 
For purpose of trial, the parties agree as follows: 
 A. The New Cannan home shall be sold upon terms and condition to be set by the court. 
 B. The Sherman home has a fair market value of $250,000 and should be awarded to the Wife. 
 C. The Mead Condo I has a fair market value of $135,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. 
 D. The Mead Condo II shall be sold upon terms and conditions to be set by the court. 
 E. By QDRO or other appropriate court order, each party should be awarded one-half of each of the following as of the date of distribution: 
 1. Husband's IRA 
 2. Baker Pension 
 3. Fidelity Annuity 
 4. Husband's 401(k). 
 F. The Husband's business (ERC) has a fair market of $196,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. 
 G. The Wife's Automobile has a fair market value of $30,000 and should be awarded to Wife. 
 H. The Husband's Automobile has a fair market value of $7,000 and should be awarded to the Husband. 
 I. Pursuit to the stipulation dated September 8, 1998 the plaintiff admits the following: 
 1. She has no physical or mental condition which prohibits her from being employed full-time; and 
 2. Plaintiff intends to resume full time employment. 
 J. The term of alimony shall be until the death of either party or the Wife's remarriage, whichever event first occurs. The provisions of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-86 (b) shall also apply. 
 Parties and counsel have reviewed and discussed the previous two pages and request that the same be approved by the Court. 
 __________ ___________ Plaintiff Defendant 
 _________ _________ Counsel Counsel 
 The parties agree that the business valuation of Mark Harrison 12/97 has not changed after reviewing the documentation of ERC through 12/98. 
 Harrigan, J.