LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 1038717
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- In re the Marriage of RICHARD J. and
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 1038717 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“A decade later they returned to court to resolve their respective interests in Richard's Wells Fargo Retirement Annuity (Annuity).1 The trial court awarded each party a 50 percent interest in the Annuity and left it to the parties to resolve the language of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) consistent with the court's findings and order. They could not agree on the language. Without notice to either Diane or the court, Richard waived any survivor benefits in the Annuity and began 1 \As is customary in family law proceedings”
domestic relations order“ater they returned to court to resolve their respective interests in Richard's Wells Fargo Retirement Annuity (Annuity).1 The trial court awarded each party a 50 percent interest in the Annuity and left it to the parties to resolve the language of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) consistent with the court's findings and order. They could not agree on the language. Without notice to either Diane or the court, Richard waived any survivor benefits in the Annuity and began 1 \As is customary in family law proceedings”
survivor benefits“the Annuity and left it to the parties to resolve the language of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) consistent with the court's findings and order. They could not agree on the language. Without notice to either Diane or the court, Richard waived any survivor benefits in the Annuity and began 1 \As is customary in family law proceedings”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
Filed 8/28/13 Marriage of Kahdeman CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX In re the Marriage of RICHARD J. and 2d Civil No. B243812 DIANE CLARE KAHDEMAN. (Super. Ct. No. SD 011277) (Ventura County) RICHARD J. KAHDEMAN, Appellant, v. DIANE CLARE KAHDEMAN, Respondent. In 1993 appellant Richard J. Kahdeman and respondent Diane Clare Kahdeman ended their marriage. A decade later they returned to court to resolve their respective interests in Richard's Wells Fargo Retirement Annuity (Annuity).1 The trial court awarded each party a 50 percent interest in the Annuity and left it to the parties to resolve the language of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) consistent with the court's findings and order. They could not agree on the language. Without notice to either Diane or the court, Richard waived any survivor benefits in the Annuity and began 1 \As is customary in family law proceedings