LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 10564958
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 10564958 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“IONS DIVISION Case No. DR98040692 The Lampe Law Office, LLC, and Stephen Otte, for appellant. Eric D. Bender, for appellee. HENDRICKSON, J. {¶ 1} Kevin Shaw, appellant, appeals the decision of the Butler County Domestic Relations Court setting aside a Qualified Domestic Relations Order that had been in place for over 20 years. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the lower court. I. Facts and Procedural Background {¶ 2} Charles Shaw, plaintiff-appellee, and Sharon Shaw were married on August Butler CA2023-08-091 25, 1973. They had two children together: a son, Kevin, and a daughter. Charles and Sharon divorced i”
pension“5, 1973. They had two children together: a son, Kevin, and a daughter. Charles and Sharon divorced in 1999. {¶ 3} They reached an agreement regarding the division of their property, which the trial court adopted.1 Regarding Charles's federal civil service pension, the decree provided the following: [Sharon] shall receive one half of [Charles]'s pension with the U.S. Postal Service. A separate qualified domestic relations order shall issue to effectuate this division, and the court reserves jurisdiction to correct any defect in wording. To implement this provision, in October 2000, the parties executed and fil”
domestic relations order“ION Case No. DR98040692 The Lampe Law Office, LLC, and Stephen Otte, for appellant. Eric D. Bender, for appellee. HENDRICKSON, J. {¶ 1} Kevin Shaw, appellant, appeals the decision of the Butler County Domestic Relations Court setting aside a Qualified Domestic Relations Order that had been in place for over 20 years. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the lower court. I. Facts and Procedural Background {¶ 2} Charles Shaw, plaintiff-appellee, and Sharon Shaw were married on August Butler CA2023-08-091 25, 1973. They had two children together: a son, Kevin, and a daughter. Charles and Sharon divorced i”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
[Cite as Shaw v. Shaw, 2024-Ohio-3231.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
BUTLER COUNTY
KEVIN L. SHAW, :
Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2023-08-091
: OPINION
- vs - 8/26/2024
:
CHARLES W. SHAW, :
Appellee. :
CIVIL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
Case No. DR98040692
The Lampe Law Office, LLC, and Stephen Otte, for appellant.
Eric D. Bender, for appellee.
HENDRICKSON, J.
{¶ 1} Kevin Shaw, appellant, appeals the decision of the Butler County Domestic
Relations Court setting aside a Qualified Domestic Relations Order that had been in place
for over 20 years. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the lower court.
I. Facts and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} Charles Shaw, plaintiff-appellee, and Sharon Shaw were married on August
Butler CA2023-08-091
25, 1973. They had two children together: a son, Kevin, and a daughter. Charles and
Sharon divorced in 1999.
{¶ 3} They reached an agreement regarding the division of their property, which
the trial court adopted.1 Regarding Charles's federal civil service pension, the decree
provided the following:
[Sharon] shall receive one half of [Charles]'s pension with the
U.S. Postal Service. A separate qualified domestic relations
order shall issue to effectuate this division, and the court
reserves jurisdiction to correct any defect in wording.
To implement this provision, in October 2000, the parties executed and filed a Qualified
Domestic Relations Order (\QDRO\").