LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 10593929
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- 2014-000864 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 10593929 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“decree divided the assets equally between the two parties, however, a subsequent Consent Order signed by both parties established a lump sum of money that husband owed wife. Once husband paid that lump sum, wife obtained a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) for an additional share of one of the retirement accounts. Husband challenged that order pursuant to Rules 60(b)(4) and (5) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. This Court reviews the Court of Appeals' decision regarding the efficacy of the QDRO. I. Facts On December 31, 2002, Joseph A. Marshall filed for a divorce from his long-time wife Car”
retirement benefits“6, 2015 – Filed June 3, 2015 REVERSED Leon Edward Green, of Leon E. Green, PC, of Aiken, for Petitioner. Gregory P. Harlow, of Harlow Law Offices, PA, of Aiken, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: The subject of this dispute is the distribution of husband's retirement accounts in a divorce proceeding. The final divorce decree divided the assets equally between the two parties, however, a subsequent Consent Order signed by both parties established a lump sum of money that husband owed wife. Once husband paid that lump sum, wife obtained a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) for an additional share of one of the retirement a”
pension“g-time wife Carrie A. Marshall.1 On March 28, 2005, Family Court Judge Tunstall issued a Final Order terminating the marriage. The Final Order determined the division of husband's two retirement accounts. The parties agreed to equally divide husband's Bechtel Pension and 401(k) account. The parties disputed the value of the 401(k) account, but Judge Tunstall valued it at $445,000.00.2 At the time of the order, the Bechtel Pension was valued at $160,000.00. Additionally, the order states, \the husband's savings and investment”
401(k)“Carrie A. Marshall.1 On March 28, 2005, Family Court Judge Tunstall issued a Final Order terminating the marriage. The Final Order determined the division of husband's two retirement accounts. The parties agreed to equally divide husband's Bechtel Pension and 401(k) account. The parties disputed the value of the 401(k) account, but Judge Tunstall valued it at $445,000.00.2 At the time of the order, the Bechtel Pension was valued at $160,000.00. Additionally, the order states, \the husband's savings and investment”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- docket: 2014-000864 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Joseph A. Marshall, Petitioner, v. Carrie C. Marshall, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2014-000864 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Aiken County The Honorable Dale Moore Gable, Family Court Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-030 Heard May 6, 2015 – Filed June 3, 2015 REVERSED Leon Edward Green, of Leon E. Green, PC, of Aiken, for Petitioner. Gregory P. Harlow, of Harlow Law Offices, PA, of Aiken, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: The subject of this dispute is the distribution of husband's retirement accounts in a divorce proceeding. The final divorce decree divided the assets equally between the two parties, however, a subsequent Consent Order signed by both parties established a lump sum of money that husband owed wife. Once husband paid that lump sum, wife obtained a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) for an additional share of one of the retirement accounts. Husband challenged that order pursuant to Rules 60(b)(4) and (5) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. This Court reviews the Court of Appeals' decision regarding the efficacy of the QDRO. I. Facts On December 31, 2002, Joseph A. Marshall filed for a divorce from his long-time wife Carrie A. Marshall.1 On March 28, 2005, Family Court Judge Tunstall issued a Final Order terminating the marriage. The Final Order determined the division of husband's two retirement accounts. The parties agreed to equally divide husband's Bechtel Pension and 401(k) account. The parties disputed the value of the 401(k) account, but Judge Tunstall valued it at $445,000.00.2 At the time of the order, the Bechtel Pension was valued at $160,000.00. Additionally, the order states, \the husband's savings and investment