LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 1069501
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 1069501 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“OUNTY L. A. Harris, Jr., Judge (Andrea R. Stiles; Williams, Mullen, Clark & Dobbins, P.C., on briefs), for appellant. (Torrence M. Harman; Harman & Harman, P.C., on brief), for appellee. John G. Myers, Jr., contends the trial judge erred in entering qualified domestic relations orders and a domestic relations order after more than twenty-one days had elapsed from the expiration of a sixty-day period reserved by the final divorce decree for entry of the orders. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rul”
pension“t to Code § 17.1-400(D). ** Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Background On March 9, 1998, the parties entered into an agreement which contained a specified distribution to the parties of husband's retirement, pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation assets, and IRA account. In part, Section F of the agreement states that \[t]he parties agree to the following distribution of such assets”
domestic relations order“A. Harris, Jr., Judge (Andrea R. Stiles; Williams, Mullen, Clark & Dobbins, P.C., on briefs), for appellant. (Torrence M. Harman; Harman & Harman, P.C., on brief), for appellee. John G. Myers, Jr., contends the trial judge erred in entering qualified domestic relations orders and a domestic relations order after more than twenty-one days had elapsed from the expiration of a sixty-day period reserved by the final divorce decree for entry of the orders. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rul”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Retired Judge Duff* JOHN G. MYERS, JR. MEMORANDUM OPINION ** v. Record No. 1034-01-2 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 2, 2001 CHRISTINA MYERS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HENRICO COUNTY L. A. Harris, Jr., Judge (Andrea R. Stiles; Williams, Mullen, Clark & Dobbins, P.C., on briefs), for appellant. (Torrence M. Harman; Harman & Harman, P.C., on brief), for appellee. John G. Myers, Jr., contends the trial judge erred in entering qualified domestic relations orders and a domestic relations order after more than twenty-one days had elapsed from the expiration of a sixty-day period reserved by the final divorce decree for entry of the orders. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rule 5A:27. * Retired Judge Charles H. Duff took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400(D). ** Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Background On March 9, 1998, the parties entered into an agreement which contained a specified distribution to the parties of husband's retirement, pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation assets, and IRA account. In part, Section F of the agreement states that \[t]he parties agree to the following distribution of such assets