LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 1075459
Citation: Domestic Relations Order · Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- Domestic Relations Order
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 1075459 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
domestic relations order“James W. Haley, Jr., Judge (Sandra C. Graves; Rinehart & Strentz, on briefs), for appellant. (Owaiian M. Jones, on brief), for appellee. George A. Langhorne appeals the decision of the circuit judge denying his Motion for Entry of an Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order. He contends that the trial judge's ruling did not comport with the formula in the final decree of divorce or the recommendations of the commissioner in chancery. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the trial judge's decision. See Rule 5A:27. The record o”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- reporter: Domestic Relations Order
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis GEORGE A. LANGHORNE MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0810-98-4 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 10, 1998 JOANNE LANGHORNE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STAFFORD COUNTY James W. Haley, Jr., Judge (Sandra C. Graves; Rinehart & Strentz, on briefs), for appellant. (Owaiian M. Jones, on brief), for appellee. George A. Langhorne appeals the decision of the circuit judge denying his Motion for Entry of an Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order. He contends that the trial judge's ruling did not comport with the formula in the final decree of divorce or the recommendations of the commissioner in chancery. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the trial judge's decision. See Rule 5A:27. The record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor a written statement of facts. However, we conclude that the record is sufficient to decide the question raised by Langhorne because the final decree of divorce stated that the commissioner's report was adopted \and made a part of this Decree of Divorce.\" The