LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 203209
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 203209 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“e affirm, albeit for reasons different than those cited by the district court. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS At the heart of this legal battle are the orders addressing Geiger's retirement accounts. Geiger claims that those orders are not Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (\QDROs\")and are”
retirement benefits“United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-1208 DAVID R. GEIGER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FOLEY HOAG LLP RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge] Before Lipez, Circuit Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Howard, Circuit Judge. David R. Geiger, pro se. Ann Wagner, with whom Frances M. Giordano and Rubin and Rudman, LLP were on brie”
domestic relations order“albeit for reasons different than those cited by the district court. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS At the heart of this legal battle are the orders addressing Geiger's retirement accounts. Geiger claims that those orders are not Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (\QDROs\")and are”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-1208 DAVID R. GEIGER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FOLEY HOAG LLP RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge] Before Lipez, Circuit Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Howard, Circuit Judge. David R. Geiger, pro se. Ann Wagner, with whom Frances M. Giordano and Rubin and Rudman, LLP were on brief, for appellee. March 27, 2008 HOWARD, Circuit Judge. The genesis of this appeal is a contentious Massachusetts divorce. As part of the distribution of marital property, a state court judge assigned a portion of David Geiger's interest in three retirement plans to his (now ex) wife, Karen Leeds. In addition to exhausting his state court appeals of the divorce order, Geiger filed suit in federal court against the retirement plans and their administrator,1 seeking to permanently enjoin the plans from transferring Geiger's interests to Leeds. After Leeds successfully moved to intervene in the suit, she filed a motion to dismiss, which the district court granted pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. On appeal, Geiger contends that the district court first erroneously allowed Leeds's intervention, and then incorrectly granted the motion to dismiss. We affirm, albeit for reasons different than those cited by the district court. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS At the heart of this legal battle are the orders addressing Geiger's retirement accounts. Geiger claims that those orders are not Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (\QDROs\")and are