← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 2177673

Citation: domestic relations order · Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
In re MARRIAGE OF Tara MENKEN
Extracted reporter citation
domestic relations order
Docket / number
2-01-0610. Appellate
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 5/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 2177673 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

retirement benefits

f the court: After a trial, the trial court dissolved the marriage of petitioner, Tara Menken, and respondent, George Menken, awarded maintenance and child support, and divided the marital assets. The court awarded petitioner, among other things, 60% of the retirement benefits respondent earned as a member of the Rockford police department. On appeal, respondent contends that the trial court lacked the authority to order him to sign a consent form authorizing *282 petitioner to receive the retirement benefits directly pursuant to a qualified Illinois domestic relations order (QILDRO). See 40 ILCS 5/1-119(b)(1) (West 2000). We va

domestic relations order

s a member of the Rockford police department. On appeal, respondent contends that the trial court lacked the authority to order him to sign a consent form authorizing *282 petitioner to receive the retirement benefits directly pursuant to a qualified Illinois domestic relations order (QILDRO). See 40 ILCS 5/1-119(b)(1) (West 2000). We vacate the order requiring respondent to sign the consent form and affirm in all other respects.

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
reporter: domestic relations order · docket: 2-01-0610. Appellate
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

778 N.E.2d 281 (2002) 
 334 Ill. App.3d 531 
 268 Ill.Dec. 295 
 In re MARRIAGE OF Tara MENKEN, Petitioner-Appellee, and 
George Menken, Respondent-Appellant. 
 No. 2-01-0610. 
 Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. 
 October 3, 2002. 
 Barbara Giorgi Vella, Vella, Sparkman, Wheeler & Lund, P.C., Rockford, for George Menken. 
 Deron R. Benson, Rockford, for Tara Menken. 
 Presiding Justice HUTCHINSON delivered the opinion of the court: 
 After a trial, the trial court dissolved the marriage of petitioner, Tara Menken, and respondent, George Menken, awarded maintenance and child support, and divided the marital assets. The court awarded petitioner, among other things, 60% of the retirement benefits respondent earned as a member of the Rockford police department. On appeal, respondent contends that the trial court lacked the authority to order him to sign a consent form authorizing *282 petitioner to receive the retirement benefits directly pursuant to a qualified Illinois domestic relations order (QILDRO). See 40 ILCS 5/1-119(b)(1) (West 2000). We vacate the order requiring respondent to sign the consent form and affirm in all other respects.