LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 2877444
Citation: Domestic Relations Order · Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- Domestic Relations Order
- Docket / number
- after being abated by our order of June 19
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 2877444 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
retirement benefits“other reasons, if, as, and when received . 5. 50% of all sums, whether matured or unmatured, accrued or unaccrued, vested or otherwise, together with all increases thereof, the proceeds therefrom, and any other rights related to any profit-sharing plan, retirement plan, pension plan, employee stock option plan, employee savings plan, accrued unpaid bonuses, or other benefit program existing by reason of [Elia Hernandez's] past employment with Federal Aviation Authority as of July 17, 1992 . * * * * * * * [Elia Hernandez] is awarded the following as [her] sole and separate property: * * * * * * * 5. All righ”
pension“f, as, and when received . 5. 50% of all sums, whether matured or unmatured, accrued or unaccrued, vested or otherwise, together with all increases thereof, the proceeds therefrom, and any other rights related to any profit-sharing plan, retirement plan, pension plan, employee stock option plan, employee savings plan, accrued unpaid bonuses, or other benefit program existing by reason of [Elia Hernandez's] past employment with Federal Aviation Authority as of July 17, 1992 . * * * * * * * [Elia Hernandez] is awarded the following as [her] sole and separate property: * * * * * * * 5. All right, title,”
domestic relations order“een, Justice Sarah B. Duncan, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 12, 1998 REVERSED AND REMANDED This appeal is reinstated on the docket after being abated by our order of June 19, 1998. Elia Hernandez appeals from a clarification order and a Domestic Relations Order interpreting the divorce decree of her and her ex-husband, Pete Hernandez. On appeal, her primary contention is that the order is an impermissible modification of the original decree. We agree and we reverse the trial court's order. Factual and Procedural Background On August 12, 1992, the parties entered into an agreed divorce decree which dissol”
valuation/division“riginal decree. We agree and we reverse the trial court's order. Factual and Procedural Background On August 12, 1992, the parties entered into an agreed divorce decree which dissolved their marriage and divided their marital property. As part of the property division, the parties' retirement benefits were divided in the following manner: [Pete Hernandez] is awarded the following as [his] sole and separate property: * * * * * * * 4. All right, title, and interest in and to 50% of the United States Army disposable retired or retainer pay to be paid as a result of Pete Hernandez's service in the United States”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- reporter: Domestic Relations Order · docket: after being abated by our order of June 19
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
No. 04-97-00025-CV Elia HERNANDEZ , Appellant v. Pete HERNANDEZ , Appellee From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 91-CI-14162 Honorable Charles A. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Paul W. Green, Justice Sarah B. Duncan, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 12, 1998 REVERSED AND REMANDED This appeal is reinstated on the docket after being abated by our order of June 19, 1998. Elia Hernandez appeals from a clarification order and a Domestic Relations Order interpreting the divorce decree of her and her ex-husband, Pete Hernandez. On appeal, her primary contention is that the order is an impermissible modification of the original decree. We agree and we reverse the trial court's order. Factual and Procedural Background On August 12, 1992, the parties entered into an agreed divorce decree which dissolved their marriage and divided their marital property. As part of the property division, the parties' retirement benefits were divided in the following manner: [Pete Hernandez] is awarded the following as [his] sole and separate property: * * * * * * * 4. All right, title, and interest in and to 50% of the United States Army disposable retired or retainer pay to be paid as a result of Pete Hernandez's service in the United States Army . . . or other reasons, if, as, and when received . 5. 50% of all sums, whether matured or unmatured, accrued or unaccrued, vested or otherwise, together with all increases thereof, the proceeds therefrom, and any other rights related to any profit-sharing plan, retirement plan, pension plan, employee stock option plan, employee savings plan, accrued unpaid bonuses, or other benefit program existing by reason of [Elia Hernandez's] past employment with Federal Aviation Authority as of July 17, 1992 . * * * * * * * [Elia Hernandez] is awarded the following as [her] sole and separate property: * * * * * * * 5. All right, title, and interest in and to that portion of the United States Army disposable retired or retainer pay to be paid as a result of Pete Hernandez's service in the United States army not awarded in this decree to Pete Hernandez. 6. 50% of all sums, whether matured or unmatured, accrued or unaccrued, vested or otherwise, together with all increases thereof , the proceeds therefrom, and any other rights related to any profit-sharing plan, retirement plan, pension plan, employee stock option plan, employee savings plan, accrued unpaid bonuses, or other benefit program existing by reason of [Pete Hernandez's] past employment with the United States Army . The decree also stated that the parties' marriage lasted 19 years and 6 months, during which time Pete served 19 years and 10 months of creditable service toward retirement at an E-7 pay scale. In the fall of 1996, Pete retired from the military and Elia began receiving disbursement checks. Elia received 50% of Pete's retirement pay. Pete filed a motion to clarify the original decree asking the court to enter an order \to prevent Elia from receiving any benefit of his separate