LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 3143322
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 3143322 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“Appellee. ) Judge, Presiding. _________________________________________________________________________________ JUSTICE O'MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court: In these consolidated appeals, petitioner, Thomas E. David, seeks review of two amended qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) entered by the circuit court of Du Page County. The QDROs awarded a share of Thomas's pension benefits to respondent, Mary A. David. We dismiss case No. 2--04--1191 for lack of jurisdiction. In case No. 2--05--0088, we conclude that the amended QDROs were properly entered and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. BACKGROUND On”
pension“Y delivered the opinion of the court: In these consolidated appeals, petitioner, Thomas E. David, seeks review of two amended qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) entered by the circuit court of Du Page County. The QDROs awarded a share of Thomas's pension benefits to respondent, Mary A. David. We dismiss case No. 2--04--1191 for lack of jurisdiction. In case No. 2--05--0088, we conclude that the amended QDROs were properly entered and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2003, the trial court entered a judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. Among the mari”
domestic relations order“. ) Judge, Presiding. _________________________________________________________________________________ JUSTICE O'MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court: In these consolidated appeals, petitioner, Thomas E. David, seeks review of two amended qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) entered by the circuit court of Du Page County. The QDROs awarded a share of Thomas's pension benefits to respondent, Mary A. David. We dismiss case No. 2--04--1191 for lack of jurisdiction. In case No. 2--05--0088, we conclude that the amended QDROs were properly entered and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. BACKGROUND On”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
Nos. 2--04--1191 & 2--05--0088 cons. filed: 10/2/06 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ In re MARRIAGE OF ) Appeal from the Circuit Court THOMAS E. DAVID, ) of Du Page County. ) Petitioner and Counterrespondent- ) Appellant, ) ) and ) No. 00--D--2702 ) MARY A. DAVID, ) ) Honorable Respondent and Counterpetitioner- ) John W. Demling, Appellee. ) Judge, Presiding. _________________________________________________________________________________ JUSTICE O'MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court: In these consolidated appeals, petitioner, Thomas E. David, seeks review of two amended qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) entered by the circuit court of Du Page County. The QDROs awarded a share of Thomas's pension benefits to respondent, Mary A. David. We dismiss case No. 2--04--1191 for lack of jurisdiction. In case No. 2--05--0088, we conclude that the amended QDROs were properly entered and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2003, the trial court entered a judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. Among the marital property divided under the judgment were various retirement funds, including Thomas's pensions with Commonwealth Edison Company (ComEd) and Exelon Corporation (Exelon). According to the judgment, the pensions were in \payout status.\" Thomas was evidently a