← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 3717864

Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
pending
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 5/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 3717864 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: pension / defined benefit issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jerome Kingery, appeals the December 28, 2004 judgment of the Logan County Court of Common Pleas and the accompanying Second Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). In its judgment entry, the trial court granted plaintiff-appellee, Jacqueline Kingery's, Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order and ordered that plaintiff be entitled to share equally in defendant's pension benefits. {¶ 2} The parties were married on July 1, 1978. The marriage was terminated following a h

retirement benefits

, July 1 st , 1978, to the date of the Divorce hearing, March 14, 2000. [Jacqueline] shall not share in any early retirement subsidies of supplements, which might be otherwise payable to [Jerome]. * * * For purposes of calculating [Jacqueline's portion of the retirement benefits], the Plan Administrator is instructed to use, if applicable, [Jerome's] average compensation and/or the benefit multiplier in effect under the plan as of [Jacqueline's] benefit commencement date. {¶ 3} Jerome retired from his job at International Truck and Engine Corporation on February 1, 2004. He opted for early retirement under a \window program

pension

elations Order (QDRO). In its judgment entry, the trial court granted plaintiff-appellee, Jacqueline Kingery's, Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order and ordered that plaintiff be entitled to share equally in defendant's pension benefits. {¶ 2} The parties were married on July 1, 1978. The marriage was terminated following a hearing on March 14, 2000, and the trial court filed a judgment entry and Decree of Divorce on April 26, 2000. The divorce decree provides as follows: 13. The Defendant, Jerome Kingery is the owner of a pension plan at International Harvester. The Plai

domestic relations order

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jerome Kingery, appeals the December 28, 2004 judgment of the Logan County Court of Common Pleas and the accompanying Second Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). In its judgment entry, the trial court granted plaintiff-appellee, Jacqueline Kingery's, Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order and ordered that plaintiff be entitled to share equally in defendant's pension benefits. {¶ 2} The parties were married on July 1, 1978. The marriage was terminated following a h

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
pending
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

OPINION 
 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jerome Kingery, appeals the December 28, 2004 judgment of the Logan County Court of Common Pleas and the accompanying Second Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). In its judgment entry, the trial court granted plaintiff-appellee, Jacqueline Kingery's, Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order and ordered that plaintiff be entitled to share equally in defendant's pension benefits. 
 {¶ 2} The parties were married on July 1, 1978. The marriage was terminated following a hearing on March 14, 2000, and the trial court filed a judgment entry and Decree of Divorce on April 26, 2000. The divorce decree provides as follows: 
 13. The Defendant, Jerome Kingery is the owner of a pension plan at International Harvester. The Plaintiff, Jacqueline Kingery shall receive one half (50%) of Defendant's pension which shall be distributed pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared by Defendant. 
 Pursuant to the Divorce Decree, a QDRO was prepared and filed, which was later superseded by the Amended QDRO filed July 1, 2003. The Amended QDRO provides: 
 This Order assigns to [Jacqueline] fifty percent (50%) of the benefit to which [Jerome] earned and accrued from the date of marriage, July 1 st , 1978, to the date of the Divorce hearing, March 14, 2000. [Jacqueline] shall not share in any early retirement subsidies of supplements, which might be otherwise payable to [Jerome]. * * * For purposes of calculating [Jacqueline's portion of the retirement benefits], the Plan Administrator is instructed to use, if applicable, [Jerome's] average compensation and/or the benefit multiplier in effect under the plan as of [Jacqueline's] benefit commencement date. 
 {¶ 3} Jerome retired from his job at International Truck and Engine Corporation on February 1, 2004. He opted for early retirement under a \window program\" contained in the collective bargaining agreement between UAW