← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 3758748

Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
pending
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 2/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 3758748 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

ve April 23, 1997. A trial was held on January 28, 1998, May 26, 1998, and July 31, 1998. At the time of trial, the real estate was worth $83,000.00. On March 24, 1999, the trial court granted the divorce, and on March 17, 2003, the trial court issued a final QDRO. 1 It is from the divorce decree that Appellant now appeals.

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
pending
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY . 
 {¶ 1} Appellant, James M. Carder, appeals from the divorce decree of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Relations Division. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 
 {¶ 2} Appellant and Appellee, Barbara Carder, started to live together in February 1975, and were married on April 21, 1979, in Damascus, Ohio. Appellant and Appellee have one child, William, born as issue during the marriage. Prior to their marriage, Appellant received from his mother certain real estate located in Akron, Ohio in Summit County. During the marriage, Appellant and Appellee resided in this home, which had a fair market value of $38,000.00 in 1979. Also during their marriage, Appellant and Appellee installed an above-ground swimming pool on this real estate, which cost $4,000.00. This pool was vandalized by neighborhood children during the marriage. 
 {¶ 3} On October 25, 1996, Appellee filed a complaint for divorce in the Summit County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Relations Division, requesting, inter alia, the following: an absolute divorce; an order granting Appellee temporary and permanent custody of William; an order granting Appellee temporary and permanent spousal support; and an order for equal division of assets. On November 26, 1996, a magistrate issued orders from a temporary hearing granting temporary child support, temporary spousal support, and temporarily allocating parental rights and responsibilities over William to Appellee. On May 13, 1997, the magistrate issued a supplemental order modifying the temporary orders, allocating parental rights and responsibilities to Appellant, effective April 23, 1997. A trial was held on January 28, 1998, May 26, 1998, and July 31, 1998. At the time of trial, the real estate was worth $83,000.00. On March 24, 1999, the trial court granted the divorce, and on March 17, 2003, the trial court issued a final QDRO. 1 It is from the divorce decree that Appellant now appeals.