LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 4109227
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- 20160159
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 4109227 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“ts and mineral interests; the court erred in failing to award temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric Nesheim's business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom”
pension“n of the parties' property, debts and mineral interests; the court erred in failing to award temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric Nesheim's business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom”
domestic relations order“eral interests; the court erred in failing to award temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric Nesheim's business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- docket: 20160159
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
Filed 12/20/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 244 Christine M. Nesheim, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Eric Nesheim, Defendant No. 20160159 Appeal from the District Court of Traill County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas R. Olson, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Christine M. Nesheim, 718 5th Avenue Southeast, Mayville, N.D. 58257, plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief. Eric Nesheim, defendant; no appearance. Nesheim v. Nesheim No. 20160159 Per Curiam. [¶1] Christine Nesheim appeals from a district court order denying her post- judgment motion to amend findings of fact. On appeal she argues, among other things, that the district court erred in its division of the parties' property, debts and mineral interests; the court erred in failing to award temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric Nesheim's business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom