← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 4371359

Citation: domestic relations order · Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
domestic relations order
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 2/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 4371359 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

domestic relations order

this timely application for interlocutory appeal. It appears that the juvenile court's order is directly appealable. This case is a dependency proceeding – what used to be called "deprivation" under the old juvenile code. See OCGA § 15-11-2 (22). Although a domestic relations order or an order terminating parental rights is subject to the discretionary appeal procedures, a dependency or deprivation finding may be appealed directly. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) & (12); In the Interest of J. P., 267 Ga. 492, 493 (480 SE2d 8) (1997) (deprivation/dependency cases do not fall within the purview of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) and therefore are direc

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
reporter: domestic relations order
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

 ATLANTA,____________________
 February 19, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19I0173. IN THE INTEREST OF A. B., A CHILD (MOTHER).

 In October 2018, Keara Jones, the cousin of A. B., filed a dependency
complaint in the Fulton County Juvenile Court. The juvenile court subsequently
found the minor child to be dependent and awarded Jones temporary legal custody of
the minor child and set the case for an adjudication hearing. At the adjudication
hearing, A. B.'s mother was present and moved to dismiss the private dependency
complaint. The juvenile court denied the motion to dismiss and certified its decision
for immediate review. The mother then filed this timely application for interlocutory
appeal.
 It appears that the juvenile court's order is directly appealable. This case is a
dependency proceeding – what used to be called "deprivation" under the old juvenile
code. See OCGA § 15-11-2 (22). Although a domestic relations order or an order
terminating parental rights is subject to the discretionary appeal procedures, a
dependency or deprivation finding may be appealed directly. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)
(2) & (12); In the Interest of J. P., 267 Ga. 492, 493 (480 SE2d 8) (1997)
(deprivation/dependency cases do not fall within the purview of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)
(2) and therefore are directly appealable). This includes interlocutory orders in
dependency cases deciding temporary custody of children. See In the Interest of S.
J., 270 Ga. App. 598, 608 (1) (a) (607 SE2d 225) (2004) (interim order within a
dependency/deprivation proceeding that decides temporary custody of the child is a
"final order" within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) and may be appealed
directly); see also In the Interest of W. P. B., 269 Ga. App. 101, 101 (1) (603 SE2d
454) (2004) (interim order finding child was not deprived but imposing conditions
 on the parents was directly appealable). The mother, therefore, was not required to
file an interlocutory application in this case.
 "This Court will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order
complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise filed
a notice of appeal." Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486 n. 1 (602 SE2d 246)
(2004). Accordingly, the mother's interlocutory application is hereby GRANTED.
The mother shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal
in the juvenile court. If, however, the mother has already filed a notice of appeal
from the order at issue, she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the juvenile
court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to this
Court.

 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
 Clerk's Office, Atlanta,____________________
 02/19/2019
 I certify that the above is a true extract from
 the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
 Witness my signature and the seal of said court
 hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

 , Clerk.