← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 8406622

Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
301 P.3d 850
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 2/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 8406622 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

espondent. oCT 2 4 2022 ELETH BPOWN CLE EME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a post-divorce decree district court order directing (1) appellant to obtain a life insurance policy, (2) that an indemnification QDRO will not be entered if appellant obtains the required life insurance, (3) counsel for respondent to notify the court if a compliant life insurance policy is obtained, and (4) that if appellant fails to timely obtain life insurance, the indemnification QDRO shall be submitted to the court for signature. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Divis

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
reporter: 301 P.3d 850
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

 JESUS LUIS AREVALO, No. 85169
 Appellant,
 vs.
 CATHERINE MARIE AREVALO, N/K/A FILE
 CATHERINE MARIE DELAO,
 Respondent. oCT 2 4 2022
 ELETH BPOWN
 CLE EME COURT

 BY
 DEPUTY CLERK

 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

 This is a pro se appeal from a post-divorce decree district court
 order directing (1) appellant to obtain a life insurance policy, (2) that an
 indemnification QDRO will not be entered if appellant obtains the required
 life insurance, (3) counsel for respondent to notify the court if a compliant
 life insurance policy is obtained, and (4) that if appellant fails to timely

 obtain life insurance, the indemnification QDRO shall be submitted to the
 court for signature. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division,
 Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge.
 Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court

 reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order challenged on appeal does not
 appear to be substantively appealable. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach,
 LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court \may only