LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 868100
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- FILED v. MAY
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 868100 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to pension / defined benefit issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 5/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: pension / defined benefit issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“uant to Wis. Stat. § 809.61 (2009-10). It concerns a dispute over the enforceability of a pension award in a divorce judgment. The specific question we address is whether the circuit court erred when it denied Patricia Johnson's motion for the entry of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) on the grounds that the motion was barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.40, a statute of No. 2011AP1240 repose,1 which states that \action upon a judgment or”
pension“County, Kathryn W. Foster, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 809.61 (2009-10). It concerns a dispute over the enforceability of a pension award in a divorce judgment. The specific question we address is whether the circuit court erred when it denied Patricia Johnson's motion for the entry of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) on the grounds that the motion was barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.40, a statute of No. 2011AP1240 repose,1 which states that \action upon a judgment or”
domestic relations order“s. Stat. § 809.61 (2009-10). It concerns a dispute over the enforceability of a pension award in a divorce judgment. The specific question we address is whether the circuit court erred when it denied Patricia Johnson's motion for the entry of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) on the grounds that the motion was barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.40, a statute of No. 2011AP1240 repose,1 which states that \action upon a judgment or”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
2013 WI 43 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP1240 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the marriage of: Patricia A. Johnson, p/k/a Patricia Masters, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael R. Masters, Respondent-Respondent. ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FILED: May 17, 2013 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: September 7, 2012 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Waukesha JUDGE: Kathryn W. Foster JUSTICES: CONCURRED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs. (Opinion filed.) BRADLEY, J., ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concur. (Opinion filed.) ZIEGLER, ROGGENSACK, GABLEMAN concur. (Opinion filed.) DISSENTED: PROSSER, J., dissents. (Opinion filed.) NOT PARTICIPATING: ATTORNEYS: For the petitioner-appellant, there was a brief (in court of appeals) by Joseph F. Owens and Law Offices of Joseph F. Owens, New Berlin, and Debra K. Riedel and Law Offices of Debra K. Riedel, New Berlin, and a reply brief to the Supreme Court by Joseph Owens and Debra K. Riedel. Oral argument by Joseph F. Owens. For the respondent-respondent, there was a brief by Erik I. Colque and Colque Law, LLC, Waukesha, and oral argument by Erik I. Colque. 2013 WI 43 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 2011AP1240 (L.C. No. 1988FA73) STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT Patricia A. Johnson, Petitioner–Appellant FILED v. MAY 17, 2013 Michael R. Masters, Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Supreme Court Respondent–Respondent APPEAL from an order of the Circuit Court for Waukesha County, Kathryn W. Foster, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 809.61 (2009-10). It concerns a dispute over the enforceability of a pension award in a divorce judgment. The specific question we address is whether the circuit court erred when it denied Patricia Johnson's motion for the entry of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) on the grounds that the motion was barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.40, a statute of No. 2011AP1240 repose,1 which states that \action upon a judgment or