LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 9367450
Citation: Domestic Relations order · Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- Domestic Relations order
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 9367450 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
domestic relations order“appellee. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations BEATTY BLUNT, P.J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Chad N. Woodford, appeals the May 15, 2021 decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations ordering the trial record and shared parenting decree issued on July 6, 2020 in this case to be supplemented with a child support worksheet pursuant to Civ.R. 60(A). Appellant argues that the trial court erred by supplementing the trial record with a child support worksheet as the case was already under appeal. {¶ 2} On the date that the trial court issued”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- reporter: Domestic Relations order
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
[Cite as Woodford v. Woodford, 2023-Ohio-193.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Chad N. Woodford, :
Plaintiff-Appellant, :
No. 21AP-256
v. : (C.P.C. No. 18DR-1824)
Danielle L. Woodford, : (REGULAR CALENDAR)
Defendant-Appellee. :
D E C I S I O N
Rendered on January 24, 2023
On brief: Wolinetz, Horvath & Brown, LLC, Dennis E.
Horvath, and Eric M. Brown, for appellant.
On brief: Grossman Law Offices, and Tracy A. Younkin, for
appellee.
APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas,
Division of Domestic Relations
BEATTY BLUNT, P.J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Chad N. Woodford, appeals the May 15, 2021 decision of
the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations ordering the
trial record and shared parenting decree issued on July 6, 2020 in this case to be
supplemented with a child support worksheet pursuant to Civ.R. 60(A). Appellant argues
that the trial court erred by supplementing the trial record with a child support worksheet
as the case was already under appeal.
{¶ 2} On the date that the trial court issued its order, this court had before it
appellant's separate appeal in Woodford v. Woodford, 10th Dist. No. 20AP-377, 2022-
No. 21AP-256 2
Ohio-3656 (\Woodford I\")