← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 10654083

Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
674 F.3d 369
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 2/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 10654083 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

No. 12.) As explained in the Court's Order, Plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to her through both the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan and the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan; Plaintiff failed to present a valid Qualified Domestic Relations Order entitling her to any portion of the Plans in the first instance; and Plaintiff failed to show any duty owed by Defendants to Plaintiff for the status of the First Lawsuit, any breach of such duty, or any alleged damages that resulted from said breach. (Doc. No. 10, pp. 3–4.) Additionally, the Court's Order also explained Plaintiff failed to assert any a

domestic relations order

As explained in the Court's Order, Plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to her through both the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan and the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan; Plaintiff failed to present a valid Qualified Domestic Relations Order entitling her to any portion of the Plans in the first instance; and Plaintiff failed to show any duty owed by Defendants to Plaintiff for the status of the First Lawsuit, any breach of such duty, or any alleged damages that resulted from said breach. (Doc. No. 10, pp. 3–4.) Additionally, the Court's Order also explained Plaintiff failed to assert any a

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
reporter: 674 F.3d 369
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 CHARLOTTE DIVISION 
 CASE NO. 3:24-CV-00411-FDW-DCK 
AUDREY L. KIMNER, ) 
 ) 
 ) 
 Plaintiff, ) 
 ) 
 v. ) ORDER 
 ) 
LYNN GOOD AND ) 
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, ) 
 ) 
 Defendants. ) 
 ) 

 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Vacate the Clerk's 
Judgment, Vacate the Order granting Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis and 
dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice, and Motion for Recusal.1 (Doc. No. 12.) As 
explained in the Court's Order, Plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to 
her through both the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan and the Duke Energy Retirement 
Savings Plan; Plaintiff failed to present a valid Qualified Domestic Relations Order entitling her 
to any portion of the Plans in the first instance; and Plaintiff failed to show any duty owed by 
Defendants to Plaintiff for the status of the First Lawsuit, any breach of such duty, or any alleged 
damages that resulted from said breach. (Doc. No. 10, pp. 3–4.) Additionally, the Court's Order 
also explained Plaintiff failed to assert any action on behalf of Defendant Good which indicates 
active involvement in any tortious conduct. (Id., p. 4.). 

1 The Court notes Plaintiff's Motion's caption states it is a "Request to . . . Recuse . . . ." (Doc. No. 
12, p. 1.) Plaintiff writes "these two judges who should recuse . . . ." (Id., p. 2.) As Plaintiff does 
not identify the judges she is referring to and does not make any specific arguments, the Court 
finds this to be without merit. 
 The Court believes Plaintiff intended to file her Motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 
Procedure 60(b), which provides relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding. Relief under 
this rule constitutes "an extraordinary remedy that should not be awarded except under exceptional 
circumstances." Mayfield v. Nat'l Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., 674 F.3d 369, 378 (4th 
Cir. 2012). The moving party must initially show timeliness, a meritorious defense, a lack of unfair 
prejudice to the opposing party, and exceptional circumstances. Dowell v. State Farm Fire & Cas. 
Auto. Ins. Co., 993 F.2d 46, 48 (4th Cir. 1993). Then, the moving party must satisfy the 
requirements of Rule 60(b). Id. The Court finds there is no basis to vacate the Clerk's Judgment 
and no basis to vacate its Order granting Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis and 
dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. 
 Plaintiff is once again strongly cautioned against repeatedly filing frivolous or improper 
actions. Doing so may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or prefiling injunctions that would 
limit Plaintiffs ability to file further lawsuits in this Court. 
 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Vacate the Clerk's 
Judgment, Vacate the Order granting Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis and 
dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint with prejudice, and Motion for Recusal, (Doc. No. 12), is 
DENIED. 
 IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 Signed: August 27, 2024 

 Frank D. Whitney 
 United States District Judge gl