LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 1077613
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 1077613 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PETERSBURG James F. D'Alton, Jr., Judge (Beverly D. Crawford; El-Amin & Crawford, on brief), for appellant. (James Edward Sheffield, on brief), for appellee. Eunice P. Todd (wife) appeals from the circuit court's qualified domestic relations order and final decree awarding a divorce to James E. Todd (husband). Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. Wife contends that the commissioner abused his discretion by refusing to allow her to submit additional eviden”
domestic relations order“IRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PETERSBURG James F. D'Alton, Jr., Judge (Beverly D. Crawford; El-Amin & Crawford, on brief), for appellant. (James Edward Sheffield, on brief), for appellee. Eunice P. Todd (wife) appeals from the circuit court's qualified domestic relations order and final decree awarding a divorce to James E. Todd (husband). Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. Wife contends that the commissioner abused his discretion by refusing to allow her to submit additional eviden”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton EUNICE PAULINE TODD MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2115-95-2 PER CURIAM JULY 30, 1996 JAMES EDWARD TODD FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PETERSBURG James F. D'Alton, Jr., Judge (Beverly D. Crawford; El-Amin & Crawford, on brief), for appellant. (James Edward Sheffield, on brief), for appellee. Eunice P. Todd (wife) appeals from the circuit court's qualified domestic relations order and final decree awarding a divorce to James E. Todd (husband). Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. Wife contends that the commissioner abused his discretion by refusing to allow her to submit additional evidence following a hearing of which she had notice but did not appear. Wife's counsel stated that wife told him why she was not going to appear, \but that is a matter of privileged information unless