LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 11149784
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILLIAMSON
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 11149784 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“submitted to support the motion for default established that Steven and Annie Stone retained respondent in September 1991 to file for a dissolution. Pursuant to the couple's separation agreement, respondent attempted to provide Steven Stone's employer with a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (\QDRO\") to obtain certain employee benefits”
domestic relations order“to support the motion for default established that Steven and Annie Stone retained respondent in September 1991 to file for a dissolution. Pursuant to the couple's separation agreement, respondent attempted to provide Steven Stone's employer with a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (\QDRO\") to obtain certain employee benefits”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 286.]
CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILLIAMSON.
[Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Williamson, 1995-Ohio-338.]
Attorney at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Failing to act
competently—Failing to zealously represent client—Failure to cooperate in
investigation of alleged misconduct—Violation of a Disciplinary Rule—
Illegal conduct involving moral turpitude—Conduct prejudicial to the
administrator of justice.
(No. 94-2655—Submitted April 18, 1995—Decided August 23, 1995.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 93-55.
__________________
{¶ 1} In an amended complaint filed on March 31, 1994, relator, Cuyahoga
County Bar Association, charged respondent, David A. Williamson, last known
address in Brook Park, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0003928, with seven
counts of professional misconduct. Respondent was personally served notice of the
complaint at his last known address, but did not answer. A panel of the Board of
Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court considered the
matter on relator's motion for default, filed pursuant to Gov.Bar V(6)(F).
{¶ 2} With respect to Count I, the evidence submitted to support the motion
for default established that Steven and Annie Stone retained respondent in
September 1991 to file for a dissolution. Pursuant to the couple's separation
agreement, respondent attempted to provide Steven Stone's employer with a
Qualified Domestic Relations Order (\QDRO\") to obtain certain employee benefits