← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 3167487

Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
pending
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 2/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 3167487 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

he trial court for further proceedings to determine whether the mediated settlement agreement entered into by the parties is ambiguous, and, if so, to conduct an evidentiary hearing as to the proper interpretation of that agreement and to enter an appropriate qualified domestic relations order that comports with its terms. Teague v. Teague, 122 So. 2d 3d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Reversed and Remanded. LEVINE, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

domestic relations order

ourt for further proceedings to determine whether the mediated settlement agreement entered into by the parties is ambiguous, and, if so, to conduct an evidentiary hearing as to the proper interpretation of that agreement and to enter an appropriate qualified domestic relations order that comports with its terms. Teague v. Teague, 122 So. 2d 3d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Reversed and Remanded. LEVINE, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
pending
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
 FOURTH DISTRICT

 REGINA FAZIO,
 Appellant,

 v.

 MICHAEL FAZIO,
 Appellee.

 No. 4D15-272

 [January 6, 2016]

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Laura M. Watson, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE13-
001559(42).

 Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

 Rocco G. Marucci, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

 CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

 Upon consideration of the record and the appellee's soundly based
confession of error, we reverse the trial court's order denying the
appellant's motion to vacate the fourth amended qualified domestic
relations order. We remand this matter to the trial court for further
proceedings to determine whether the mediated settlement agreement
entered into by the parties is ambiguous, and, if so, to conduct an
evidentiary hearing as to the proper interpretation of that agreement and
to enter an appropriate qualified domestic relations order that comports
with its terms. Teague v. Teague, 122 So. 2d 3d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA
2013).

 Reversed and Remanded.

LEVINE, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

 * * *

 Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.