LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 4087981
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 4087981 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“CONE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. SHARON ANSCOMBE OSGOOD, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice M. Rosa, J.), entered March 9, 2010, which granted defendant's motion to enter a stipulated qualified domestic relations order. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On this appeal by plaintiff from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we note that no appeal lies as of right from such an order (see Irato v Irato, 288 AD2d 952). Nevertheless, inasmuch as plaintiff "raised timely objections prior to the ent”
domestic relations order“UNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. SHARON ANSCOMBE OSGOOD, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice M. Rosa, J.), entered March 9, 2010, which granted defendant's motion to enter a stipulated qualified domestic relations order. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On this appeal by plaintiff from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we note that no appeal lies as of right from such an order (see Irato v Irato, 288 AD2d 952). Nevertheless, inasmuch as plaintiff "raised timely objections prior to the ent”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1502 CA 10-01598 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. EDWARD A. PISKORZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARILYN PISKORZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. ZARCONE ASSOCIATES, PLLC, AMHERST (KELLY V. ZARCONE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. SHARON ANSCOMBE OSGOOD, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice M. Rosa, J.), entered March 9, 2010, which granted defendant's motion to enter a stipulated qualified domestic relations order. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On this appeal by plaintiff from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we note that no appeal lies as of right from such an order (see Irato v Irato, 288 AD2d 952). Nevertheless, inasmuch as plaintiff "raised timely objections prior to the entry of the QDRO and thereby preserved a record for our review," we treat the notice of appeal as an application for leave to appeal and grant the application (id. at 952). Upon considering the merits of plaintiff's contention, we affirm the order. Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court