← LexyCorpus index

LexyCorpus case page

CourtListener opinion 4093316

Date unknown · US

Extracted case name
pending
Extracted reporter citation
pending
Docket / number
pending
QDRO relevance 5/5Retirement relevance 2/5Family-law relevance 5/5gold label pending
Research-use warning: This page contains machine-draft public annotations generated from public opinion text. The headnote is not Willie-approved gold-label work product and is not legal advice. Verify the full opinion and current law before relying on it.

Machine-draft headnote

Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 4093316 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.

Retrieval annotation

Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.

Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues

Evidence quotes

QDRO

(Darren H. Fairlie of counsel), for respondent. __________ McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Schick, J.), entered January 2, 2015 in Sullivan County, which, upon reargument, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion to vacate a qualified domestic relations order. In October 2006, the parties entered into a stipulation that was incorporated, but not merged, into their judgment of divorce. The stipulation provided, among other things, that \the

domestic relations order

Fairlie of counsel), for respondent. __________ McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Schick, J.), entered January 2, 2015 in Sullivan County, which, upon reargument, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion to vacate a qualified domestic relations order. In October 2006, the parties entered into a stipulation that was incorporated, but not merged, into their judgment of divorce. The stipulation provided, among other things, that \the

Source and provenance

Source type
courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
Permissions posture
public
Generated status
machine draft public v0
Review status
gold label pending
Jurisdiction metadata
US
Deterministic extraction
pending
Generated at
May 14, 2026

Related public corpus pages

Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.

Clean opinion text

State of New York
 Supreme Court, Appellate Division
 Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: October 27, 2016 521960
________________________________

JENNIFER SANDERS,
 Respondent,
 v
 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MITCHELL SANDERS,
 Appellant.
________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Garry, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

 __________

 Law Office of Terry D. Horner, Poughkeepsie (Terry D.
Horner of counsel), for appellant.

 Stenger, Roberts, Davis & Diamond, LLP, Wappingers Falls
(Darren H. Fairlie of counsel), for respondent.

 __________

McCarthy, J.

 Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Schick, J.),
entered January 2, 2015 in Sullivan County, which, upon
reargument, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion to
vacate a qualified domestic relations order.

 In October 2006, the parties entered into a stipulation
that was incorporated, but not merged, into their judgment of
divorce. The stipulation provided, among other things, that \the