LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 4411250
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- 741 P.2d 432
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 4411250 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“appears that it was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of the judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The decree of divorce was entered on October 16, 2018, with written notice of entry served on October 17, 2018. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order was filed January 9, 2019, with written notice of entry served on January 10, 2019, but the notice of appeal was not filed until March 26, 2019, and a second notice of appeal was filed on April 5, 2019, both well after the expiration of the 30- day time period to appeal. NRAP 4(a). An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.”
domestic relations order“hat it was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of the judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The decree of divorce was entered on October 16, 2018, with written notice of entry served on October 17, 2018. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order was filed January 9, 2019, with written notice of entry served on January 10, 2019, but the notice of appeal was not filed until March 26, 2019, and a second notice of appeal was filed on April 5, 2019, both well after the expiration of the 30- day time period to appeal. NRAP 4(a). An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- reporter: 741 P.2d 432
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JEFFREY K. BROWN, No. 78554 Appellant, vs. FARHA BROWN, Respondent. FL APR 2 2 2019 ELIZALiEll , A. 11::'...:YWN CLERK OF 'Zi.iPh.•1).. C.:, COURT BY—S—S-CS DEPUTI Cu:7Jc_ if ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a divorce decree. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Denise L. Gentile, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of the judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The decree of divorce was entered on October 16, 2018, with written notice of entry served on October 17, 2018. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order was filed January 9, 2019, with written notice of entry served on January 10, 2019, but the notice of appeal was not filed until March 26, 2019, and a second notice of appeal was filed on April 5, 2019, both well after the expiration of the 30- day time period to appeal. NRAP 4(a). An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court. See Healy v. Volkswagenwerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 004. (0) 1947A - 1,7 s coct Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433 (1987) (noting that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in an appellate court). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and therefore ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. Pick ring °L-2111t.r. J. 0 Cadish 6694 J. cc: Hon. Denise L. Gentile, District Judge, Family Court Division Jeffrey K. Brown Farha Brown Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e 2