LexyCorpus case page
CourtListener opinion 8207755
Date unknown · US
- Extracted case name
- pending
- Extracted reporter citation
- pending
- Docket / number
- pending
Machine-draft headnote
Machine-draft public headnote: CourtListener opinion 8207755 is included in the LexyCorpus QDRO sample set as a public CourtListener opinion with relevance to QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues. The current annotation is conservative: it identifies source provenance, relevance signals, and evidence quotes for attorney/agent retrieval. It is not a Willie-approved legal headnote yet.
Retrieval annotation
Draft retrieval summary: this opinion has QDRO relevance score 5/5, retirement-division score 2/5, and family-law score 5/5. Use the quoted text and full opinion below before relying on the case.
Category: QDRO procedure / domestic relations order issues
Evidence quotes
QDRO“ent Entry, the trial court set forth what transpired at the December 13, 2021 and the February 2, 2022 hearings, respectively, and made orders. The February 14, 2022, Judgment Entry made final orders with respect to the then-pending motions as follows: 1. Qualified Domestic Relations Order. After further discussion and drafting, the parties agreed on the terms and language to be included in the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) called for in section 14.C. (on pages 27-28) of the Decree of Divorce. The parties approved the QDRO and submitted it to the Court for review and approval. The Court approved the QDRO, signed it, and”
domestic relations order“the trial court set forth what transpired at the December 13, 2021 and the February 2, 2022 hearings, respectively, and made orders. The February 14, 2022, Judgment Entry made final orders with respect to the then-pending motions as follows: 1. Qualified Domestic Relations Order. After further discussion and drafting, the parties agreed on the terms and language to be included in the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) called for in section 14.C. (on pages 27-28) of the Decree of Divorce. The parties approved the QDRO and submitted it to the Court for review and approval. The Court approved the QDRO, signed it, and”
Source and provenance
- Source type
- courtlistener_qdro_opinion_full_text
- Permissions posture
- public
- Generated status
- machine draft public v0
- Review status
- gold label pending
- Jurisdiction metadata
- US
- Deterministic extraction
- pending
- Generated at
- May 14, 2026
Related public corpus pages
Deterministic links based on shared title/citation terms and QDRO / retirement / family-law retrieval scores.
Clean opinion text
[Cite as Leaf v. Leaf, 2022-Ohio-3301.]
COURT OF APPEALS
DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
BRIAN E. LEAF JUDGES:
Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., P. J.
Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J.
Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
-vs-
Case No. 22 CAF 03 0016
RHONDA J. LEAF (nka RING)
Defendant-Appellant OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Civil Appeal from the Court of Common
Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Case
No. 19 DRA 12 0678
JUDGMENT: Affirmed
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: September 20, 2022
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
DOUGLAS W. WARNOCK RHONDA J. RING
DOUGLAS W. WARNOCK CO., LPA PRO SE
20 East Central Avenue 2020 Wilson Road
Delaware, Ohio 43015 Sunbury, Ohio 43074
Delaware County, Case No. 22 CAF 03 0016 2
Wise, John, J.
{¶1} Defendant-Appellant Rhonda J. Leaf nka Ring appeals the February 14,
2022, decision of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas wherein the court ruled
on six pending post-decree motions.
{¶2} Plaintiff-Appellee is Brian E. Leaf.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶3} The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows:
{¶4} The parties in this matter were married on February 21, 1999.
{¶5} Two children were born as issue of the marriage: M.L. (DOB December 21,
2001) and H.L. (DOB October 16, 2004).
{¶6} Plaintiff-Appellee Brian Leaf filed a Complaint for Divorce on December 9,
2019.
{¶7} An Agreed Judgment Entry-Decree of Divorce was filed herein on June 30,
2021. Said Decree made final orders as to: the allocation of parental rights and
responsibilities for a minor child; the award, amount, term, and payment of spousal
support by Appellee to Appellant; and, the division of all of the parties' property, including
assets and liabilities. The Decree was reviewed and approved by both parties and their
respective attorneys; initialed and signed by Appellee and Appellant; signed by legal
counsel for each of the parties; and, reviewed, approved, signed, and filed by the trial
court. No appeal was taken from the Divorce Decree.
{¶8} On December 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Contempt and Other Relief
and a Motion to Excuse or Extend Time for Payments and, or, Stay Certain Orders.
Delaware County, Case No. 22 CAF 03 0016 3
{¶9} On December 7, 2021, Defendant filed a Motion to Release Attorney and to
Stay Certain Orders.
{¶10} On January 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Approve Qualified Domestic
Relations Order.
{¶11} On January 18, 2022, Defendant filed a Motion for Contempt and Other
Relief and a Motion for Completion of Payment Per Divorce Decree (6/30/21) and
Contempt of Court Order.
{¶12} Hearings were held on these post-decree proceedings on December 13,
2021 and February 2, 2022. At each of these hearings, the trial court heard testimony and
took evidence. Following each of the said hearings, the trial court issued Judgment
Entries.
{¶13} In the December 21, 2021, Judgment Entry and the February 14, 2022,
Judgment Entry, the trial court set forth what transpired at the December 13, 2021 and
the February 2, 2022 hearings, respectively, and made orders. The February 14, 2022,
Judgment Entry made final orders with respect to the then-pending motions as follows:
1. Qualified Domestic Relations Order. After further discussion
and drafting, the parties agreed on the terms and language to be included
in the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) called for in section 14.C.
(on pages 27-28) of the Decree of Divorce. The parties approved the QDRO
and submitted it to the Court for review and approval. The Court approved
the QDRO, signed it, and filed it on February 2, 2022.
2. Timeshare- Hilton Grand Vacation Company; LLC. LV Tower
52 Vacation Suites, A Vacation Ownership Resort Member Number
Delaware County, Case No. 22 CAF 03 0016 4
792701696. The orders and provisions set forth in the Decree of Divorce in
section 7.D. (on pages 18-19), as the same relate to the said timeshare: are
clear and unambiguous; shall not be changed; and, shall remain in full force
and effect as written therein. The evidence showed that the timeshare
cannot be divided into separate one-bedroom units for each of the parties.
Therefore, as provided in the Decree of Divorce, the parties shall proceed
to \sell the timeshare at the best price obtainable